N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Abortion
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Most lawmakers polled back abortion consent rule - Ja 3 87 3C
- Panel rejects proposals on abortion fund - Ja 16 87 22D
- Assembly outlook '87 - Ja 18 87 1D
- Rules on state-paid abortions stir dissent - My 15 87 1
- Editorial: Making an ordeal worse - My 22 87 22A
- House panel supports giving taxpayers choice on abortion fund - My 27 87 4C
- Abortion consent backed; Parental approval required under bill - My 28 87 1
- Abortion consent bill worries judges, pro-choice advocates - My 29 87 13A
- Abortion bill to Senate - My 31 87 29A
- Suit seeks to block agency's new rules on state-paid abortions - Jn 2 87 1C
- Judge stops new rules on abortion - Jn 26 87 1
- Editorial: Fairness on abortion - Jn 27 87 16A
- Senate panel hears views on abortion bill - Jy 1 87 10A
- Medical group fights abortion consent bill - Jy 3 87 18A
- Consent bill reviewed - Jy 5 87 26A
- Commission won't appeal block on abortion rules - Jy 8 87 5B
- Campaigning for what she believes in (Lansing; abortion) - Jy 10 87 1B
- Both sides cite rights in abortion dispute (Crist Clinic) - Jy 19 87 31A
- Amendment to target state-funded abortions - Au 5 87 7A
- Unanimous Senate enacts budget; Measure extends education initiatives, keeps abortion fund intact - Au 7 87 1D
- Under the Dome: Abortion fund spat surprising to some - Au 9 87 1
- 1983 abortions decrease in nation, increase in N.C. - Au 30 87 33A
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!