N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Air Freight Service
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Martin defends pursuit of air-cargo complex - Ja 8 92, 3B
- Air-cargo complex flies into head wind - Ja 19 92, 1F
- TransPark concept took off quickly - Ja 19 92, 1F
- Air-cargo facility report due today - Fe 11 92, 2D
- Study favors military base to host air-cargo complex - Fe 12 92, 1
- Editorial: A 'base' for air cargo - Fe 13 92, 12A
- Duplin residents fear complex would mar area's rural charm - Mr 9 92, 6B
- Air-cargo sites in budget for RDU; Slow revenue growth prompts suggestion to trim operating costs - Mr 11 92, 9C
- Commander cites downside to transpark - Mr 12 92, 6C
- Air-cargo field proposal for Goldsboro boosted - Mr 17 92, 5B
- Lancaster backing air cargo facility; Project could force closing of Seymour Johnson, congressman says - Mr 20 92, 5B
- Editorial: An air cargo flight plan - Mr 23 92, 8A
- Martin puts air-cargo complex on fast track - Ap 9 92, 8C
- Air-cargo sites proposed - (Map) - Ap 17 92, 6C
- Charlotte, Piedmont air-cargo sites reviewed - Ap 23 92, 10C
- Two sites lead for air cargo complex (Kinston; Laurinburg-Maxton) - Ap 29 92, 1B
- Potential sites for air-cargo complex whittled to 2 - My 15 92, 6C
- Area thrilled by complex; Kinston, counties see bright future for Eastern N.C. - My 20 92, 4A
- Kinston picked as site for air cargo complex - My 20 92, 1
- Editorial: Cargo victory for Kinston - My 21 92, 18A
- Huge Kinston airport plan doesn't sit well with some neighbors - My 25 92, 1
- Kinston's air-cargo pitch added to edge it already had - My 26 92, 1D
- Editorial: the air cargo mystery - My 28 92, 20A
- Tar Heel editors speak: the state's airfield of dreams - Jn 7 92, 23A
- Air-cargo complex likely to require additional land - Jn 11 92, 10C
- Group to fight air cargo complex - Jn 26 92, 8C
- Lenoir group fighting air cargo complex; Residents near airport fear loss of their land - Jn 26 92, 5B
- 250 opponents discuss N.C.'s air cargo project - Jy 3 92, 5B
- Air-cargo airport opponents get hearing from governor - Jy 22 92, 14C
- Air-cargo complex may bring $2 million in research grants - Jy 29 92, 12C
- Air cargo park plans won't affect (Dobbs) school - Se 15 92, 5B
- Firms showing interest in transpark - Se 25 92, 8C
- Study says TransPark must get there first; Competing projects called threat to success - Se 29 92, 1D
- FAA approves air-cargo funds - Oc 7 92, 10C
- Air cargo plan OK'd; State wins deal to take airport - Oc 9 92, 1B
- N.C. airports sending groups to cargo forum - Oc 15 92, 5B
- Tar Heel editors speak: Approach TransPark with caution - Oc 18 92, 17A
- Under the Dome: DOT official (Sughrue) leaves for air cargo post - No 11 92, 1B
- Experts think cargo airport's time isn't now; TransPark seen as potential white elephant - De 6 92, 1F
- Editorial: Caution light for TransPark - De 8 92, 10A
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!