N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Apportionment (Election Law)
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Delays in redistricting ruling threaten schedule, Ramsey says - Ja 5 82 26
- Computer pros to aid redistricting effort - Ja 7 82 34
- Under the dome: Districting woes spur Washington trip - Ja 12 82 1
- Mixed approach proposed for redistricting - Ja 19 82 21
- (Justice) Department vetoes redistricting plan - Ja 22 82 1
- Mixed district bag draws tentative OK - Ja 23 82 22
- Lawmakers may trim absentee voting time - Ja 25 82 19
- Under the dome: New study of district plan may be sought - Ja 27 82 1
- Details of House redistricting plan - Ja 29 82 11
- Details of Senate redistricting plan - Ja 29 82 10
- Redistricting panels vote to split counties - Ja 29 82 1
- Redistricting plans undergo informal review - Ja 30 82 34
- Under the dome: Troopers delivering redistricting plan (to county courthouses) - Ja 30 82 1
- County, township split protested (Wake Forest township) - Fe 2 82 17
- Under the dome: Durham's spot in district plan discussed - Fe 2 82 1
- Congressional redistricting fight to reopen - Fe 3 82 22
- Lawmaker assails absence of minorities (in General Assembly) - Fe 3 82 22
- 2nd, 4th districts to undergo change in congressional redistricting plan - Fe 4 82 39
- Local politicians, black leaders blast latest redistricting plans - Fe 5 82 1D
- Congressmen prefer '81 plan, Jones says - Fe 6 82 8A
- Panel adopts N. C. House plan with four new black districts - Fe 6 82 1
- Black districts pose ironic threat to liberals - Fe 7 82 27A
- Under the dome: Jones meets with redistricting lawyer - Fe 7 82 1
- Editorial: Last chance for legislators - Fe 9 82 4A
- Redistricting efforts to be renewed today - Fe 9 82 5B
- House, Senate district plans advance - Fe 10 82 1
- Legislative panels back plan to shift Durham to 2nd - Fe 10 82 18A
- House, Senate approve plans for legislative redistricting - Fe 11 82 1
- Pleas fail to keep Durham from 2nd - Fe 11 82 1
- Legislature enacts new redistricting plan, adjourns - Fe 12 82 4D
- Redistricting plan contains inequities, Rep. Fountain says - Fe 12 82 4D
- Under the dome: Self-preservation marks district battle - Fe 13 82 1
- Districting woes may have cost Democrats chance to oust GOP - Fe 14 82 32A
- Effects of redistricting depend on where you sit - Fe 14 82 32A
- NAACP group continues lawsuit over redistricting - Fe 16 82 3C
- Redistricting may face more court trouble - Fe 20 82 14A
- Farmer (Speed) to represent part of Wake in Senate - Fe 21 82 25A
- Congressional districting plan OK'd - Mr 12 82 1
- Fight renewed against redistricting plan - Mr 18 82 19A
- Under the dome: No imminent districting decision seen - Mr 30 82 1
- Under the dome: State legislators to push for OK of district plans - Ap 9 82 12A
- Under the dome: Redistricting meeting spurs optimism - Ap 10 82 1
- N. C. redistricting plans rejected - Ap 20 82 1
- Redistricting reply angers legislators - Ap 21 82 10C
- Under the dome: Officials to seek redistricting advice - Ap 22 82 1
- Legislative session requested to decide redistricting moves - Ap 23 82 1D
- Hunt orders redistricting session - Ap 24 82 1C
- Editorial: Redistricting, again - Ap 25 82 4D
- Redistricting woes wreck primary dates - Ap 25 82 30A
- Redistricting change begun; primary on June 10 studied - Ap 27 82 1C
- Redistricting plans, June primary OK'd - Ap 28 82 1
- Editorial: Incumbents gain an edge - Ap 30 82 4A
- N. C. accepts June 29 primary; district plans given federal OK - My 1 82 1
- 13 Forsyth voters' lawsuit challenges redistricting plan - My 5 82 3C
- 13 Forsyth voters have suit filed to fight parts of redistricting plan - My 5 82 12C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!