N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Athletes - Academic Requirements
Article(s) Referenced In:
- High school athletes' class requirement up - Fe 7 85 1
- Washburn case to raise issue of athletic low scorers in class - Fe 8 85 1
- Editorial: Sports out of bounds - Fe 10 85 4D
- Faculty members concerned that colleges baby-sitting athletes - Fe 10 85 23A
- Graduating in 4 years is tough, NCSU ex-players say - Fe 12 85 1
- Editorial: the value of naming names - Fe 13 85 4A
- Friday queried on standards for athletes - Fe 20 85 14C
- Officials call for review of athletics policies - Fe 21 85 1
- Editorial: Putting sports in focus - Fe 22 85 4A
- New entrance policy for athletes had been set in '84, letter shows - Fe 22 85 15A
- SAT-minimum bills alarm universities - Fe 22 85 1
- Basketball just a path to a goal at (Laurinburg) institute - Fe 25 85 1
- (NCSU) Faculty group set to consider athletic reform - Fe 26 85 1C
- (NCSU) Faculty Senate wants freshmen out of top sports - Fe 27 85 1
- (NCSU) Athletic-admission proposal will get unhurried study - Fe 28 85 16C
- Editorial: Good for academicians - Fe 28 85 4A
- Riley wants records on academics kept private - Mr 2 85 1C
- Friday seeks support on frosh rule - Mr 5 85 1B
- Ex-dean at Laurinburg says players failed to do school work - Mr 6 85 1C
- Poulton says athletes' lower standards, freshman eligibility must end at NCSU - Mr 6 85 1
- Officials favor tougher enforcement - Ap 18 85 1B
- Laurinburg athletes' credentials satisfactory, college officials say - Mr 7 85 23A
- Committee is formed to review athletic policies at UNC campuses - Mr 9 85 1C
- Survey on athletics OK'd by UNC panel - Mr 16 85 4C
- Athletes' grade problems disputed - Mr 25 85 16C
- UNC professor says academics need to be stressed to athletes - My 17 85 4D
- UNC chancellors pledge to support new athletic rules - My 30 85 5C
- Editorial: UNC bloc for NCAA - My 31 85 16A
- Sports scandals reflect wider problem - Jn 2 85 38A
- State university officials ready to make athletics rules stricter - Jn 15 85 1C
- Friday expects endorsement of proposals - Jn 18 85 1B
- Area coaches favor tougher stand - Jn 19 85 4B
- Debate continues about rules for freshman athletic eligibility - Jy 25 85 5C
- ACC schools won't impose Proposition 48, Casey says - Jy 26 85 9A
- Friday says standards must be upheld - Au 2 85 1C
- UNC governors oppose weakening Proposition 48 - Se 14 85 1
- NCSU trustees OK resolution by students on Proposition 48 - Se 15 85 33A
- Schools in UNC system must abide by Prop 48 - Se 19 85 1B
- Editorial: NCAA: Hold that line - Se 21 85 24A
- Exceptions to admissions policies - (Chart) - Oc 11 85 6A
- Low scores, graduation rates found in UNC System athletics - Oc 11 85 1
- Report cites statistics on athletes' graduation rates - Oc 11 85 14A
- Measures in place at UNC-CH, ECU - Oc 12 85 1B
- UNC governors approve athletics-academics report - Oc 12 85 1C
- UNC laterals a hot potato to its chancellors - Oc 13 85 16A
- Smith, Crum think report unfair to UNC - Oc 16 85 1B
- Athlete with SATs under 500 admitted, UNC report says - Oc 18 85 1D
- UNC followed admissions policy in athlete's case, Fordham says - Oc 19 85 1C
- Poulton criticizes coach Reed for not supporting Proposition 48 - Oc 26 85 1
- Rules for athletic admissions not uniform - Oc 26 85 1
- Poulton angered by his role in controversy - Oc 31 85 1B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!