N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Billboards
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Cities seek to whittle roadside billboards - Ja 12 87 16C
- Advertising company (Naegele) loses bid to beat limits on billboard size - Fe 24 87 1C
- Municipalities praise ruling on billboards - Fe 25 87 18C
- City Council to study ban on all billboards - My 6 87 3C
- Bill to weaken sign restrictions zooms through House committee - My 8 87 1
- Editorial: Backward on billboards - My 8 87 18A
- Billboard proposal's foes win delay - My 9 87 10A
- Billboard bill delayed - My 10 87 38A
- Counties' bids to control billboards may be thwarted by the legislature - My 12 87 1C
- Sign bill gets tentative OK from House - My 13 87 1
- Editorial: Sign for the Senate: Stop - My 14 87 18A
- House passes sign bill after exempting Raleigh - My 14 87 1
- Billboard bill changed - My 17 87 30A
- Senate OKs payment for removed billboards - My 22 87 17A
- Senate is set to debate bill on billboards - My 25 87 1C
- Dare County islet focus of debate on sign ordinance - Jn 1 87 1C
- Editorial: Let the billboard bill die - Jn 1 87 12A
- Billboard act hits yellow light in committee - Jy 8 87 2C
- Editorial: Stop sign on billboards - Jy 11 87 16A
- Billboard showdown expected; Senate panel has held measure since May 13 - Jy 23 87 25A
- Senate panel apparently kills billboard reimbursement bill - Jy 24 87 1
- Billboard ordinances post victory in Senate - Jy 26 87 29A
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!