N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Billboards
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Editorial: City of oaks, or billboards? - Ap 23 83 4A
- Panel backs new thoroughfare zoning with setbacks, spacing for billboards - Jn 28 83 1C
- Hunt uncommitted on billboards, aide says - Au 20 83 2C
- N. C. cities deal with sign problems - Au 29 83 6A
- Raleigh joins cities across the nation in trend to ban or restrict billboards - Au 29 83 1
- Panel urges billboard ban or tighter size restrictions (Raleigh) - Au 30 83 1
- Durham developer says billboard ban would aid cities - Se 30 83 8B
- Stiffer requirements for billboards would hurt Naegele, founder says - Oc 5 83 6A
- New billboard rules viewed as toughest in state - Oc 19 83 2C
- Wake imposes moratorium on billboards - No 8 83 1
- Garner committee suggests stringent rules on billboards - No 26 83 2C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!