N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Carolina Power and Light Company
Article(s) Referenced In:
- CP and L wants 12.6 percent rate boost - Fe 22 84 1
- Ingram, Edmisten oppose utilities' rate hike, surcharge - Fe 24 84 7B
- Editorial: CP and L asks too much - Fe 25 84 4A
- Former employees say CP and L dismissed them because of race - Fe 28 84 10A
- CP and L says uranium enrichment contract to save $60 million - Mr 20 84 9A
- CP and L audit raises financial questions - Mr 28 84 8B
- Brunswick nuclear unit shut down - Mr 29 84 1
- Duke Power, CP and L to give $7 million for Pa. N-plant cleanup - Mr 29 84 16C
- CP and L chief's pay rose 6.3% in '83 - Ap 7 84 1C
- Effect of competition for long-distance, in-state calls debated - Ap 9 84 1C
- CP and L bond approval predicted by Aycock - Ap 18 84 WA-1
- CP and L urged to cut pay, cancel reactor - Ap 18 84 WA-1
- Tornado victims to get CP and L refund - My 2 84 2C
- CP and L shareholders told nuclear unit helps outlook - My 17 84 20A
- Group to ask state to make CP and L reveal figures on blacks - My 17 84 18C
- CP and L customers save $34 million in conservation - My 26 84 4C
- NRC official cites progress at Brunswick (nuclear plant) - Jn 21 84 4C
- Public Staff opposes nearly all of proposed CP and L rate increase - Jn 27 84 1C
- Brunswick reactors termed unreliable - Jn 30 84 4C
- Townsfolk angered as old oak cut down (Spring Hope) - Jy 6 84 1C
- Most speakers oppose rate request by CP and L - Jy 10 84 14C
- Utilities rated above average in output, fiscally weak - Jy 15 84 25A
- CP and L cites reasons behind rate hike request - Jy 17 84 1C
- Utility's CWIP request called unneeded - Au 8 84 14C
- Staff raises CP and L rate hike recommendation to $18 million - Au 9 84 24A
- CP and L improves operations at nuclear plants - Au 28 84 1
- CP and L chided for using tank to store water - Se 8 84 8A
- CP and L begins fish inspections (near Shearon Harris plant) - Se 12 84 16C
- CP and L says future rates may shift every minute - Se 13 84 21A
- Commission OKs CP and L's request to sell Ky. mines - Se 18 84 1
- Utilities panel OKs $64.3 million hike in rates for CP and L - Se 22 84 1
- CP and L invokes immediate rate increase; typical summer bill up 10.9% to
- $7.85 - Se 27 84 1
- Town (Lillington), CP and L battle over renewal terms in franchise
- contract - Se 27 84 3C
- Public advocates, CP and L file appeals of rate hike ruling - Oc 9 84 16C
- Ex-worker says CP and L fired, blacklisted him - Oc 23 84 1C
- CP and L mends (Brunswick) N-plant operation, public relations, analyst
- says - No 9 84 1D
- Panel approves CP and L rate hike below amount utility imposed - No 21 84 2C
- Two firms to work on energy system (to improve electric utility power
- operations) - No 28 84 8B
- Shearon Harris plant expected to cause CP and L rate increase - De 11 84 8B
- Projected cost of Harris plant up to $300 billion, CP and L says - De 20 84 1C
- CP and L, ex-employee settle dispute on Harris plant safety - De 29 84 2C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!