N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Carolina Power and Light Company
Article(s) Referenced In:
- CP and L foregoes 1986 electricity production, $24 million tax break - Ja 2 87 18D
- CP and L trying to ease industries' rate burden - Ja 7 87 6B
- 5-year plan to set goals for CP and L - Ja 15 87 8B
- CP and L argues committee (to monitor Shearon Harris) needs technical knowledge - Ja 16 87 4D
- CP and L rate increase illegally approved, court rules - Mr 4 87 5C
- Mayo unit canceled, CP and L says - Mr 19 87 1C
- Duke Power to provide juice for CP and L - Mr 20 87 WA-1
- Utility chiefs got raises of up to 30% - Ap 12 87 1I
- CP and L gets minor criticism from NRC for nuclear plant evacuation exercise - Ap 18 87 4C
- CP and L seeks to issue refund, raise rates - My 2 87 15A
- CP and L chief says Harris plant brightens outlook - My 21 87 8B
- Thornburg backs cuts in CP and L rate request - My 26 87 3C
- Customers jeer CP and L's details on rate proposal - My 29 87 8B
- Public Staff urges denying CP and L increase - My 30 87 1C
- CP and L urges panel to OK rate hike - Jn 2 87 3C
- 70 attend hearing on request for 13% CP and L rate increase - Jn 9 87 1C
- Study urges CP and L role in boosting rural economy - Jn 9 87 1D
- CP and L president tells panel rate hike is needed - Jn 10 87 1C
- Clayton signs on to help CP and L boost economy - Jn 21 87 1I
- State high court upholds CP and L refund order - Jy 8 87 5B
- CP and L wins 7% increase in rates - Au 6 87 1
- CP and L rate increase higher for summer than for winter use - Au 7 87 1D
- CP and L files notice of mid-September rate hike request - Au 9 87 34A
- CP and L shifting gears - Au 23 87 1I
- State details bid for super collider; Two utilities pledge to split burden of power supply for research - Se 4 76 5D
- CP and L asks 14% rate hike - Se 11 87 1
- CP and L hopes for a switch; Request seeks reversal in decline of earnings - Se 11 87 5C
- Officials faced with justifying plant's expense - Se 11 87 13A
- CP and L reviewing size of work force, may eliminate some jobs - Se 16 87 1C
- Duke, CP and L nuclear plants criticized - Se 17 87 23A
- NRC staff urges penalty against CP and L - Se 23 87 4C
- CP and L work force cut may prompt 100 layoffs - Se 24 87 1C
- CP and L N-plant's good marks spur warning of complacency - Oc 2 87 5C
- CP and L cutting 200 jobs - Oc 22 87 7B
- Audit says Harris plant mistakes cost $297 million - De 22 87 1
- CP and L says one-time drop of $1.80 per share possible - De 22 87 1D
- Editorial: Halo doesn't fit CP and L - De 27 87 6D
- CP and L project shows how public-private ventures can work - De 28 87 6A
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!