N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: CFC
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Officials considering delay in picking nuclear dump site - Jn 20 86 6B
- Ecology groups back N.C. in suit (against license for hazardous waste) - Jn 21 86 16A
- Bill on hazardous waste sites debated - Jn 26 86 28A
- Bladen residents savor victory over incinerator - Jn 29 86 36A
- Waste disposal still an issue despite setback, officials say - Jy 2 86 17A
- Committee says some data for considering waste site inaccurate or outdated - Jy 3 86 9B
- Martin to lobby against N.C. waste site - Au 8 86 20A
- Robeson residents oppose waste site plan - Au 22 86 8B
- Health risks under review for waste plant - Au 30 86 24C
- N.C. still top choice for radioactive waste site - Se 5 86 8B
- 3 N.C. counties join list of potential sites for low-level waste - Se 10 86 18C
- N.C. officials to argue for disposing of waste elsewhere - Se 10 86 18C
- N.C. to be considered first for nuclear waste site - Se 11 86 1
- 36 N.C. counties listed as suitable for waste site - Se 12 86 14A
- N.C. chosen for low-level waste site - Se 12 86 1
- Editorial: N.C.'s turn with waste - Se 13 86 16A
- N.C. will need waste site regardless of compact - Se 13 86 1C
- Environmentalists in Western N.C. oppose low-level waste site in area - Se 14 86 38A
- Martin says no to compact session - Se 14 86 35A
- Four companies want to operate N.C. waste disposal site - Se 18 86 2C
- N.C. nuclear waste sites evaluated - Se 18 86 5C
- N.C. officials debate threat of waste site - Se 18 86 5C
- Lessons learned from waste site in Wilkes County - Se 19 86 5D
- State hears comment on waste plant - Se 20 86 11A
- Editorial: Waste issue still alive - Se 22 86 14A
- Problems feared if N.C. leaves waste compact - Se 22 86 1C
- Speakers express concern about low-level waste site - Se 26 86 18A
- Editorial: State waste site unavoidable - Se 29 86 10A
- Anson County acts quickly against waste-site rumor - Oc 4 86 2C
- Council of State OKs funds for waste-site search - Oc 8 86 12A
- State panel begins complex planning for an N.C. radioactive disposal site - Oc 14 86 18C
- (Legislative) Panel calls for repeal of nuclear waste law - No 15 86 12B
- Consultant narrows list to 153 possible waste sites - No 15 86 4C
- State delays decision on waste plant - No 20 86 24C
- Price, Clarke unite against waste site - No 21 86 24A
- Under the dome: State discusses radioactive waste plans - No 23 86 1
- Geographic selection backed for waste panel - De 5 86 3B
- Panel studies options on low-level waste site - De 23 86 7B
- Under the dome: Trip being planned to S.C. waste site - De 29 86 1
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!