N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Coastal Resources Commission, North Carolina

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Coastal panel OKs Topsail's land-use plan - Ja 25 92, 6B
2. Dinner invitation for commissioners raises eyebrows - My 28 92, 8B
3. Editorial: On Weyerhaeuser's tab - My 30 92, 21A
4. Panel delays decision on seawall at fort - My 30 92, 5B
5. Coastal panel facing new seawall debate - Jn 20 92, 5B
6. Developer on panel (Thornton) faces conflict of interest charges - Jn 30 92, 5B
7. Coastal panel gets 4 new faces (Kirby; Bonner; Bunch; Hargitt) - Jy 3 92, 4B
8. Environmentalists welcome new coastal panel; Four new members could shift balance on - development issues - Jy 4 92, 5B
9. State panel denies Topsail Beach bid to build seawall - Jy 24 92, 5B
10. Sea wall for fort rejected; Erosion eating away at Civil War landmark - Jy 25 92, 1
11. Hackney resigns from coastal resources panel - Au 8 92, 5B
12. State ethics board eyes vote of member of coastal commission (Thornton) - Au 13 92, 5B
13. Developer (Thornton) reappointed to coastal panel; Martin acts after Ethics Board finds no conflict - Au 18 92, - 5B
14. Coastal panel to hear public on seawalls - Se 25 92, 5B
15. Coastal commission to consider ethics policy - Se 26 92, 5B
16. Panel hears pleas to change state seawall rules - No 20 92, 5B
17. 11th-hour erosion votes set; Rules meeting seen as Martin farewell - De 10 92, 5B
18. Coastal panel OKs Fort Fisher seawall; Variances also cover Dare jetties - De 15 92, 1
19. Editorial: No ebb on coastal rules - De 16 92, 16A

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.