N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Environmental Management Commission, North Carolina
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Commission wants review of progress by Chatham in developing Jordan plan - Ja 11 85 8B
- Environmental panel moves to regain authority - Ja 11 85 8B
- Official says coastal growth guards ignored - Ja 31 85 16C
- Instructions seen as hurting island condo project - Fe 15 85 6B
- Uncertainties remain about Jordan Lake's toxicity, report says - Fe 15 85 2D
- Questions about use of Jordan Lake remain, report says - Fe 17 85 31A
- Environmental Management panel asks staff for coastal growth advice - Mr 15 85 15A
- Phosphate removal will be required at Butner, EMC says - Jn 14 85 17A
- Storm-water runoff ruling delayed - Jn 14 85 19A
- Four environmental commission members replaced - Jn 27 85 2C
- Storm-water management bill advances - Jy 4 85 15B
- Environmental commission to review authority it has relinquished to others - Jy 12 85 1D
- Protection affirmed for 2 area lakes (Falls; Jordan) - Jy 12 85 1D
- Battle lines drawn over coastal runoff standards - Au 18 85 34A
- Stricter standards approved to protect some waters behind Wrightsville Beach - Oc 11 85 4C
- Water management rules need work, panel says - No 14 85 5C
- Plan would allow state to protect watersheds - No 27 85 1C
- EMC requests delay in storm water rules adoption - De 13 85 5D
- Plan to protect watersheds endorsed by commissioners - De 17 85 1C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!