N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Environmental Management Commission, North Carolina

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Proposal would weaken rules for water supplies - Ja 23 92, 1
2. Editorial: Watershed giveaway - Ja 26 92, 6J
3. Watershed shield faces well-heeled challenge - Ja 26 92, 1
4. Tar Heel editors speak: Looking for balance - Fe 2 92, 7J
5. Editorial: Your water at stake - Fe 9 92, 6G
6. Water quality rules at fork; State panel set for critical vote - Fe 12 92, 1B
7. What is the EMC? - (Chart) - Fe 12 92, 2B
8. Editorial: Fateful day for drinking water - Fe 13 92, 12A
9. Water vote likely close; Telephone blitz swamps panel - Fe 13 92, 1B
10. Watershed rules diluted; Developers get nod from EMC - Fe 14 92, 1
11. Editorial: A sieve for water - Fe 16 92, 6G
12. Debate on water to continue; Battle on watersheds moving to local level - Fe 22 92, 1B
13. 'Minimum standards'? Hardly - Fe 23 92, 7C
14. Vote on small marinas called bad precedent - Mr 17 92, 5B
15. Editorial: Clean-water comeback - Ap 21 92, 8A
16. EMC set to assign watershed categories - My 14 92, 1
17. State adopts restrictions on watersheds - My 15 92, 1B
18. Dioxin rules may change; State panel to consider whether to loosen standards - Jy 8 92, 1
19. Public hearings requested on watershed rules - Se 24 92, 6B
20. Environmental groups seek more hearings (on watershed protections) - Oc 10 92, 5B
21. Panel gives New River highest protection level - De 11 92, 5B
22. Release of new groundwater rules delayed - De 11 92, 2B
23. Editorial: Guarding the groundwater - De 20 92, 30A

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.