N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Insurance, Malpractice Liability
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Malpractice insurer calls moratorium - Ja 17 86 1
- Editorial: Rural doctors jeopardized (insurance costs) - Ja 19 86 6A
- Malpractice insurance premium hike expected - Ja 21 86 1
- Malpractice insurer to require $1,000 investment by doctors - Ja 28 86 4C
- Plan would quadruple premiums for some family practice doctors - Fe 5 86 4C
- Insurance hike could end some obstetric services - Fe 7 86 3D
- Editorial: Insurance rules hit home - Fe 10 86 10A
- Insurer's rate request called incomplete - Fe 11 86 1C
- Malpractice insurer using high estimates - Fe 12 86 1
- Malpractice insurer defends hike proposal - Fe 14 86 1
- Doctor says premium hike could be ploy - Mr 15 86 17A
- Doctors ask Long to review increase at public hearing - Mr 27 86 4C
- Editorial: Doctors' discipline needs help - Ap 14 86 14A
- Medical Mutual asked to justify 357 percent increase in premiums - Ap 16 86 1C
- Three Tarboro doctors end obstetric practices - My 2 86 4D
- N.C. Medical Society trying to get help in bid to have liability laws reformed - My 4 86 33A
- Panel studies malpractice insurance issue - My 9 86 11B
- Panel considers ordering insurers to provide malpractice-case data - My 18 86 33A
- Legislators reviewing '75 insurance plan - My 20 86 8B
- Proposed changes in liability law criticized - My 22 86 24C
- N.C. medical malpractice insurance: Insurance claims paid; Average claim paid (Chart) - Jn 3 86 1C
- Panel hears debate on medical malpractice insurance bills - Jn 18 86 10A
- Greenville maternity ward crowded as some rural doctors stop delivering - Au 11 86 1C
- Insurance costs pushing doctors out of obstetrics - Au 13 86 1C
- Editorial: Rates limit obstetric care - Au 15 86 22A
- Malpractice panel tables law proposals - Se 14 86 41A
- Malpractice insurance often cheaper in N.C. - Oc 5 86 37A
- Long tells doctors his office can't help with malpractice premium dispute - Oc 22 86 18C
- Editorial: Error on the commissioner - Oc 23 86 22A
- Insurance hike protested by doctors' group - Oc 31 86 4D
- Editorial: Doctors need Long's help - No 7 86 24A
- Family doctors plan to go back to Long with insurance woes - No 9 86 37A
- Long disputes doctor's insurance complaints - No 11 86 2C
- Poll shows support for liability limits, but expert critical - No 17 86 18C
- No-fault coverage for obstetrics proposed to cut insurance costs - No 22 86 1
- Editorial: Faults with no-fault - No 25 86 12A
- Doctors win second chance for new N.C. liability laws - De 13 86 1C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!