N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Jetties
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Interior secretary backs Oregon Inlet jetties - Mr 18 92, 8B
- Jones ponders next move to start work on Oregon Inlet jetties - Mr 20 92, 5B
- Tar Heel editors speak: Jetties studied enough...But critical questions remain - Mr 29 92, 5G
- Editorial: Holding back the jetty set - Ap 1 92, 8A
- Editorial: Holding back the jetty set - Ap 6 92, 8A
- Jetty bill is stripped of delaying provision - Jy 24 92, 5B
- Coastal panel to hear public on seawalls - Se 25 92, 5B
- N.C. jetties expected to get OK; Conditional approval likely from Lujan - Oc 6 92, 1
- Jetty project still faces hurdles - Oc 7 92, 2B
- Jetties receive conditional nod; Lujan leaves refuge, seashore questions on Oregon Inlet table - Oc 30 92, 5B
- Approval of jetties contested; Environmentalists file federal suit - No 3 92, 5B
- Proposal on ban on jetties mulled; Plan would make two exemptions (Fort Fisher; Oregon Inlet) - De 14 92, 2B
- Coastal panel OKs Fort Fisher seawall; Variances also cover Dare jetties - De 15 92, 1
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!