N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Jetties

Article(s) Referenced In:

  1. Interior secretary backs Oregon Inlet jetties - Mr 18 92, 8B
  2. Jones ponders next move to start work on Oregon Inlet jetties - Mr 20 92, 5B
  3. Tar Heel editors speak: Jetties studied enough...But critical questions remain - Mr 29 92, 5G
  4. Editorial: Holding back the jetty set - Ap 1 92, 8A
  5. Editorial: Holding back the jetty set - Ap 6 92, 8A
  6. Jetty bill is stripped of delaying provision - Jy 24 92, 5B
  7. Coastal panel to hear public on seawalls - Se 25 92, 5B
  8. N.C. jetties expected to get OK; Conditional approval likely from Lujan - Oc 6 92, 1
  9. Jetty project still faces hurdles - Oc 7 92, 2B
  10. Jetties receive conditional nod; Lujan leaves refuge, seashore questions on Oregon Inlet table - Oc 30 92, 5B
  11. Approval of jetties contested; Environmentalists file federal suit - No 3 92, 5B
  12. Proposal on ban on jetties mulled; Plan would make two exemptions (Fort Fisher; Oregon Inlet) - De 14 92, 2B
  13. Coastal panel OKs Fort Fisher seawall; Variances also cover Dare jetties - De 15 92, 1

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.

N&O Index Card

Places you might find this article:

Search For This Topic