N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Real Estate Development

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Mountaintop condo (on Little Sugar Mt.) spurs proposals to limit heights - Ja 24 83 3C
2. Editorial: on top of Old Condo - Ja 27 83 4A
3. Hunt suggests limits on height of buildings on mountain ridges - Ja 30 83 14A
4. Push for new rules stalls condo (Sugar Mountain) - Fe 26 83 2C
5. Lawmakers consider ridge laws to protect N. C. mountaintops - Fe 28 83 4C
6. Bill introduced to limit mountaintop development - Mr 11 83 7C
7. Editorial: Timid ridge law won't do - Mr 19 83 4A
8. Senate panel backs ridge building limit - Ap 7 83 12A
9. Editorial: Ridge law needs teeth - Ap 9 83 4A
10. Ridge law (action delayed) - Ap 14 83 16A
11. Senate endorses bill to limit ridge building - Ap 16 83 4C
12. Editorial: Ridge law a state concern - Ap 17 83 4D
13. Reasons for 'ridge law' detailed - Ap 19 83 2C
14. Amendment delays 'ridge law' proposal - Ap 20 83 14C

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.