N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Real Estate Development
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Out-of-state builders migrate to Wake - Ja 13 85 1F
- State OK expected soon for island condominiums - Ja 29 85 2C
- Official says coastal growth guards ignored - Ja 31 85 16C
- Rapid growth in office space spurs concerns of oversupply - Fe 26 85 1D
- Officials say N.C. leads South in losing farms to development - Mr 3 85 35A
- Rules might affect development density (near shellfish waters) - Mr 8 85 6D
- Environmental Management panel asks staff for coastal growth advice - Mr 15 85 15A
- Work on 51-acre office park near RTP in Durham County to start next month (Central Park) - Ap 18 85 1C
- Groups move to stop project that may taint shellfish waters (Carteret County) - Ap 20 85 2C
- Developers announce resort plans (Topsail Island) - My 18 85 2C
- Developers give Onslow County 1.7 acres of land (for beach access) - My 21 85 16C
- Senate OKs development fees - My 31 85 1D
- House approves developer-fee bill - Jn 25 85 1C
- Coastal development guidelines published - Au 22 85 21A
- Atlanta, Raleigh among growth areas - Au 27 85 3D
- Developers should donate land for trails, Greenway panel says - Au 29 85 1C
- NCNB to develop land near RTP - No 2 85 1C
- Regulation of development uneven in Falls Lake basin - No 24 85 29A
- Proposal to allow more development near lakes stirs concern - De 4 85 1C
- State official wars Onslow developer (Bostic) about violations - De 11 85 3C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!