N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Real Estate Development

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Senate backs ridgetop high-rise ban - Ap 27 83 2C
2. Editorial: Stronger ridge law needed - Ap 30 83 4A
3. Speakers hail, assail ridge regulation bill - My 12 83 5C
4. Ridge law - Jn 8 83 4C
5. Editorial: Ridge law needs a boost - Jn 9 83 4A
6. Panel adopts compromise version of ridge law - Jn 10 83 5B
7. Soil runoff feared sullying mountain water - Jn 13 83 12C
8. Ridge law - Jn 16 83 26A
9. Ridge law compromise clears panel - Jn 18 83 2C
10. House approves limit on building height on ridges - Jn 24 83 2D
11. Editorial; in sight of a ridge law - Jn 26 83 4D
12. Senator says ridge-law remarks cleared up in talk with Green - Jn 30 83 15A
13. House member snubbed as Senate passes ridge bill - Jy 2 83 14C
14. Official says counties will 'opt out' of ridge law - Jy 12 83 2C
15. Editorial: Big sugar on Little Sugar - Jy 16 83 4A
16. 'Condo-mania' hits the coast - Jy 17 83 1D
17. Here's what is being done about coastal growth - Jy 17 83 7D
18. Editorial: High Falls Lake risk (subdivisions in watershed) - Au 5 83 4A
19. Developers fined for sedimentation (36 mountain projects) - Se 30 83 2D
20. Deadline looms on rules for ridges - De 9 83 2D
21. Counties limit construction atop ridges - De 22 83 5C

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.