N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Real Estate Development - Wake County
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Small plots at Falls Lake surprise Wake planners - Jn 2 83 1
- Plan for Falls project presented to officials - Jn 4 83 3C
- New homes hinder highway plans - Jn 6 83 1C
- Board OKs moratorium on projects with sewage plants - Jy 7 83 2C
- Falls Lake dispute about development is urban vs. rural - Jy 11 83 1
- Falls Lake landowners' investments reap profits - Jy 24 83 1
- Perry Creek land-use plan OK'd - Au 3 83 4C
- Residential lake sites approved (Falls Lake basin) - Au 4 83 1
- Board OKs ninth subdivision in Falls watershed - Se 22 83 1
- Panel urges strictest limits in critical watershed areas - Se 23 83 1D
- Subdivision plan at Falls Lake endorsed - Oc 11 83 1C
- RTP neighbors protest plans to limit development further - Oc 29 83 1C
- Editorial: Falls Lake a political issue - No 7 83 4A
- Standards proposed for lake areas - No 29 83 1
- Level of watershed growth controls debated - De 1 83 1C
- Grimsley backs tight control for Falls, Jordan lakes areas - De 2 83 4D
- Irate property owners criticize strict development plan for I-40 - De 6 83 1
- Localities take up the burden of controlling lake development - De 26 83 1
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!