N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Real Estate Development - Wake County

Article(s) Referenced In:

  1. Small plots at Falls Lake surprise Wake planners - Jn 2 83 1
  2. Plan for Falls project presented to officials - Jn 4 83 3C
  3. New homes hinder highway plans - Jn 6 83 1C
  4. Board OKs moratorium on projects with sewage plants - Jy 7 83 2C
  5. Falls Lake dispute about development is urban vs. rural - Jy 11 83 1
  6. Falls Lake landowners' investments reap profits - Jy 24 83 1
  7. Perry Creek land-use plan OK'd - Au 3 83 4C
  8. Residential lake sites approved (Falls Lake basin) - Au 4 83 1
  9. Board OKs ninth subdivision in Falls watershed - Se 22 83 1
  10. Panel urges strictest limits in critical watershed areas - Se 23 83 1D
  11. Subdivision plan at Falls Lake endorsed - Oc 11 83 1C
  12. RTP neighbors protest plans to limit development further - Oc 29 83 1C
  13. Editorial: Falls Lake a political issue - No 7 83 4A
  14. Standards proposed for lake areas - No 29 83 1
  15. Level of watershed growth controls debated - De 1 83 1C
  16. Grimsley backs tight control for Falls, Jordan lakes areas - De 2 83 4D
  17. Irate property owners criticize strict development plan for I-40 - De 6 83 1
  18. Localities take up the burden of controlling lake development - De 26 83 1

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.

N&O Index Card

Places you might find this article:

Search For This Topic