N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Separation of Powers
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Court rules law violates doctrine (SEPARATION OF POWERS) - Ja 13 82 1
- Legislators on boards - Ja 13 82 6
- Decision sends message to lawmakers - Ja 14 82 1
- Editorial: Ending a power plan - Ja 14 82 4
- Court ruling shakes up N. C. government - Ja 15 82 4
- Lawyer says EMC ruling may apply retroactively - Ja 15 82 31
- Under the dome: Ruling worries Transportation Board - Ja 16 82 1
- Hunt, legislators tentatively agree to seek court view on branch roles - Ja 21 82 27
- Hunt seeks advisory opinion from court (on separation of powers) - Ja 24 82 28-I
- Official (Wallace) sees ruling as issue of separation of powers - Ja 25 82 30
- Under the dome: View on panels sought (from attorney general) - Ja 27 82 9
- Under the dome: Officials meet, discuss ruling on lawmakers - Fe 3 82 6
- Center says court ruling may affect 36 panels - Fe 12 82 4D
- Legislators to sit out board meetings - Fe 13 82 1
- Editorial: Not a trial separation - Fe 17 82 4A
- Edmisten to urge (legislative) appointees' resignations (from board and commissions) - Fe 18 82 1
- Hunt says he'd follow advice on resignations - Fe 20 82 4C
- Legislators requested to resign from panels - Fe 23 82 1C
- Separation of powers protects the people - Fe 26 82 4A
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!