N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Article(s) Referenced In:
- CP and L say reinspections (of Shearon Harris) would be costly, unneeded - Ja 8 86 16C
- Harris site may be used to store fuel from 2 plants - Ja 18 86 1C
- Officials differ on warning system for Harris N-plant - Ja 25 86 1C
- Federal energy official praises plans for notification at Shearon Harris - Mr 6 86 5C
- Neighbors of N-plant express uneasiness - Mr 10 86 1C
- Group begins campaign to stop opening of Shearon Harris plant - Ap 15 86 8B
- Residents form group to oppose opening of Shearon Harris plant - Ap 20 86 36A
- Shearon Harris gets 1st load of uranium fuel - Ap 25 86 19A
- Board clears way for CP and L N-plant - Ap 26 86 1
- One-man protest against CP and L plant likely to continue (Eddleman) - Ap 28 86 5A
- Shearon Harris nearing start-up; foes still at work - Ap 28 86 4A
- License endorsed for CP and L N-plant - Ap 30 86 1C
- Public Staff opposes one-time charge to pay for Shearon Harris N-plant - My 17 86 1C
- Durham council OKs resolution against N-plant - My 20 86 2C
- Residents express N-plant concerns - My 21 86 2C
- Chairman defends Harris N-plant - My 22 86 1
- Wake residents say county needs evacuation plan for nuclear disaster - My 22 86 1C
- Editorial: Emergency plans flawed - My 23 86 24A
- Evacuation plan rejection urged - My 23 86 4D
- N-plant foes increase effort to halt start-up - My 27 86 1C
- Chatham board votes to quit emergency plan for N-plant - My 28 86 1
- Resolutions opposing N-plant sought in Chapel Hill, Carrboro - My 28 86 5A
- CP and L warns delay could cost $2 million daily - My 29 86 1
- Wake officials still support evacuation plan - My 29 86 7A
- Candidates say they oppose Harris plant - My 30 86 5A
- Council urged to get Raleigh in CP and L evacuation plan - My 30 86 4A
- Martin says he's 'comfortable' with start-up of Shearon Harris - My 30 86 1
- Safety board questions nuclear plant warning systems - My 30 86 4A
- Sanford supports Chatham pullout (to handle Shearon Harris emergency) - My 30 86 1D
- Editorial: Safe or sorry at Harris - My 31 86 20A
- Group pushing N-plant issue in Orange race - Jn 2 86 4C
- Pump fails at Harris plant in test of emergency system - Jn 3 86 1C
- Opponents of Harris plant urge action to delay licensing - Jn 4 86 5C
- Martin sings two tunes on nuclear issues - Jn 6 86 16A
- Methodists oppose N-plant opening - Jn 6 86 1D
- Opponents tell Raleigh residents Harris plant not safe - Jn 6 86 22D
- Price urges delay in N-plant opening pending Raleigh plan - Jn 6 86 3D
- CP and L, federal agencies laud plant's safety - Jn 8 86 31A
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!