N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Southern Bell Telephone Company
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Measured-rate telephone service criticized - Ja 7 83 1D
- 35% phone rate hike request expected - Ja 8 83 1
- Higher rates still a bargain, Southern Bell official says - Ja 12 83 13A
- Callers to Southern Bell decry proposed rate hike - Fe 12 83 4C
- Southern Bell asks 60% basic-rate hike - Fe 9 83 1
- Utility panel sets prices for buying telephones - Mr 5 83 1C
- Southern Bell promotes advanced phone services - Mr 17 83 17A
- Southern Bell requests higher prices for phones - Mr 19 83 14C
- Southern Bell appeals Wake assessment - Ap 1 83 3D
- Southern Bell to spend $242 million across N. C. this year - Ap 1 83 14A
- Settlement reached on Bell's Wake taxes - Ap 22 83 4D
- Carolina Telephone opposes Southern Bell hike - My 27 83 29A
- Bell's per-call plan rejected - Jn 4 83 1
- Phone rate rise of only $10 million urged - Jn 14 83 1
- Southern Bell's long-distance fee would hook even local-only callers - Jn 14 83 6A
- Southern Bell official defends requested hike - Jy 7 83 1C
- Southern Bell says rise in directory aid charge would net $1.4 million - Jy 13 83 14C
- Strike unlikely to affect N. C. phones, officials say - Au 7 83 26A
- Pay, job security key issues in Raleigh - Au 8 83 1
- Local rates still to be bargain, Bell official says - Au 19 83 2D
- Bell mum on local settlement's chances - Au 23 83 14C
- Bell may cite settlement in rate hikes, union says - Au 26 83 7A
- Raleigh, Cary, Apex in plan to test per-call phone rates - Se 2 83 2D
- Southern Bell rate hike cut sharply - Se 15 83 1
- Commissioner dissents in Bell rate case - Se 16 83 16D
- Edmisten protests phone access fee - Se 27 83 4C
- Southern Bell assures stockholders dividends are stable - Se 29 83 2C
- Utilities panel asks lawmakers to oppose phone fees - Se 29 83 20A
- Panel to fight Southern Bell plan for long-distance access fee - Oc 6 83 9B
- Access fee will go up, phone official admits - Oc 11 83 14A
- Southern Bell predicts $11 fee for long-distance access in '90 - Oc 12 83 1
- Editorial: Excess for access - Oc 14 83 4A
- Most speakers at hearing oppose phone access fee - Oc 18 83 2C
- Southern Bell hikes access fee request - Oc 20 83 1
- Editorial: Ma Bell wants cushion - Oc 23 83 4D
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!