N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Super Collider
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Reagan's support to spur N.C. action on smasher - Ja 31 87 9A
- Unexpected requirements put squeeze on collider bid - Fe 12 87 4C
- Added cost of pursuing collider is worth it to state, officials say - Fe 19 87 20C
- Martin undaunted by super collider odds - Fe 21 87 1
- Martin says funding must be increased for collider project - Fe 25 87 18C
- Competition keen for super collider - Mr 8 87 1
- Proposed location of supercollider (Map) - Mr 8 87 10A
- Collider bid, waste compact linked - Mr 17 87 4C
- Firm (Law Engineering) chosen to do study for collider - Mr 21 87 11A
- A tiny tremor of concern for super collider bid; Microseismic noise ... - Mr 25 87 12A
- Fund for super collider bid hits $1.15 million - Ap 2 87 1C
- Project director named for super collider bid (Frampton) - Ap 3 87 2D
- Collider wouldn't foul the land; But U.S. plan envisions service units around project's 53 mile ring - Ap 5 87 31A
- N.C. seeking more time for accelerator bid - Ap 8 87 18C
- Martin warns against collider bidding war between states - Ap 9 87 22C
- Trying to find out what's really matter; New supercollider could hold key - My 13 87 8A
- Officials fear amendment's effect on supercollider decision - My 23 87 4C
- Supercollider committee lacks Tar Heels - Jn 24 87 5C
- State's bid for supercollider gets boost in vote on land use - Jn 26 87 26D
- Super-collider deadline extended - Jy 16 87 24C
- Collider would bring speeded-up spending - Jy 20 87 1C
- Computer maps go beyond the surface - Jy 22 87 8A
- Study says super collider a large low-level waste producer - Jy 23 87 28C
- Universities to expand physics faculties if South wins bid for super collider - Au 6 87 7B
- Senate passes measure on super collider land - Au 13 87 20A
- State offers dowry for super collider - Au 27 87 1
- N.C. rated a top collider contender - Au 31 87 1C
- State details bid for super collider; Two utilities pledge to split burden of power supply for research - Se 4 76 5D
- Valentine has reservations about collider - Se 15 87 5C
- Valentine clarifies super collider stand - Se 19 87 2C
- N.C. likely to make cut for super collider, official says - Oc 28 87 2C
- Conservation board opposes super collider bid exemption - Oc 29 87 27A
- Super collider bid includes highway plan - No 9 87 WA-1
- Environmental group fears collider would taint water supply - No 11 87 3C
- Martin calls collider aid to nation - De 5 87 13A
- N.C. passes early test for collider - De 8 87 11A
- N.C. among 8 finalists for super collider site - De 30 87 1
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!