N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Transportation, North Carolina Department of
Article(s) Referenced In:
- N.C. 12 sandbag contract awarded - Ja 18 92, 4B
- Towns voice concerns about Clayton bypass - Fe 29 92, 3B
- Guardrails limit access to the Eno River - Mr 19 92, 2B
- Jury betters state's offer; Couple wins $4.5 million - Ap 11 92, 1B
- On-the-job death toll rises by 2 at state DOT - Ap 14 92, 6B
- Highway projects, politics linked - My 21 92, 4B
- DOT appointees' pay under threat - My 29 92, 4B
- DOT may not approve naming road after King - My 29 92, 5B
- Under the Dome: Newspaper stories bugging Harrelson - Jn 5 92, 1B
- Under the Dome: DOT engineers, attorney at odds - Jn 6 92, 1B
- Courts like Democrats, Martin says - Jn 12 92, 1B
- Probe of DOT urged; Study calls for an end to transportation board - Jn 18 92, 4B
- Standoff threatens road funds (DOT and Durham and Orange counties) - Jn 27 92, 2B
- State responds to dispute by freezing highway funds - Jy 2 92, 3B
- Have bridge, will travel, transportation department says - Jy 14 92, 8B
- Editorial: Shunning DOT dogma - Jy 27 92, 6A
- Although safer, rail bridge being replaced - Au 8 92, 3B
- State didn't use all its power to improve crossing - Au 8 92, 1
- Funds for rail crossing upgrades sent off track by road projects - Au 9 92, 1
- Proposed freeway to Norfolk seems like a mirage to many - Au 15 92, 4B
- 2 Martin allies (Rouse; Fetzer) named to key posts with DOT - Au 20 92, 5B
- State sets lead tests; DOT workers to be examined - Au 27 92, 1B
- Wishes for roads at odds; Some leaders push for people-friendly plans - Au 27 92, 1
- DOT workers begin tests for lead (in Highway Bldg.) - Au 28 92, 4B
- Lead expert suggests vacating parts of (Highway) building - Au 29 92, 1B
- DOT serves politicians, not public, group says - Se 12 92, 5B
- Legislators say DOT 'arrogant' in handling rail crossing safety - Oc 9 92, 4B
- State seeks middle ground on Sunset's bridge - Oc 30 92, 5B
- Expressway work leaves thousands of fish dead - No 24 92, 1B
- Editorial: DOT's disturbing fish story - No 27 92, 14A
- Rail company seeks to halt DOT plans (condemning land controlled by Norfolk Southern) - De 30 92, 5B
- State backs wider 64, 17; Raleigh-Norfolk link is planned - De 30 92, 1B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!