N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Watersheds

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Block seeks temporary ban on watershed development - Ja 6 84 1
2. Editorial: Gasoline, water don't mix - Ja 9 84 4A
3. Hunt to seek watershed budget OK - Ja 10 84 4C
4. Ex-board member to seek watershed zoning changes - Fe 14 84 3C
5. Planners favor extending Falls limits - Fe 16 84 1C
6. Wake denies petition to increase Swift Creek density - Fe 21 84 12C
7. Watershed development rules approved in Wake - Mr 6 84 1
8. Heater offers changes to plan for watersheds - Mr 19 84 1C
9. Planning board OKs year's ninth project in Falls watershed - Ap 20 84 4D
10. Watershed responses due, 3 areas (Alamance, Person Cos.; Pittsboro)
11. are told - My 5 84 1C
12. Planners protect watershed, reservoir - My 17 84 2C
13. Falls watershed zone could prevent smooth sailing for Durham proposal - My 24 84 4C
14. Editorial: Trouble up the Neuse - My 26 84 4A
15. Zoning rules OK'd to help (Swift Creek) watershed - Jy 3 84 1C
16. Local officials avoid water plan target dates; progress praised - Jy 26 84 17A
17. Planning committee urges strict control of Swift Creek watershed
18. development - Au 31 84 18D
19. Panel debates Falls Lake area development restrictions - Se 14 84 2D
20. Wake Planning Board OKs buffer for Swift Creek area - Oc 4 84 22A
21. Water quality improvement ureged - Oc 9 84 1C
22. Panel informally shifts border for development in Falls basin - Oc 12 84 1D
23. Program to reduce runoff in watersheds - Oc 24 84 4C
24. Commission to get report next week on local efforts in Falls, Jordan
25. basins - No 1 84 1C
26. Panel accepts Falls-Jordan report without comment - No 9 84 20A
27. Panel to pursue efforts against pollution at lakes - No 11 84 29A
28. Editorial: Watersheds need action - No 13 84 4A
29. Sewage plant in Falls watershed denied; developers plan appeal - No 13 84 1
30. Editorial: Water-pollution danger - No 20 84 4A
31. Falls Lake policy plaguing council - No 26 84 1
32. Plans for sewage treatment plant modified (Falls Lake watershed) - De 3 84 4C
33. Panel expected to urge approval of private sewage treatment plan
34. (Falls Lake watershed) - De 5 84 5C
35. Board proposes tight standards in Jordan basin - De 6 84 29A
36. Rules to improve lakes' quality stir zoning fights in watersheds - De 10 84 1
37. Question posed on two projects near Falls Lake - De 14 84 5B
38. Wake commissioners approve buffer for Swift Creek, lakes - De 18 84 1C

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.