N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Watersheds

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Watershed controls may hike bills - Jn 10 83 1D
2. Major owners of property in watershed - Jy 24 83 22A
3. Hearing set for tonight on watershed proposals (Falls and Jordan lakes) - Au 9 83 3C
4. Counties agree state must lead in Falls controls - Au 31 83 1
5. Editorial: Larger lake role for state - Se 2 83 4A
6. Upchurch urges state to set up Falls board - Se 13 83 4C
7. Wake health board toughens rules on sewage treatment in watersheds - Se 13 83 1
8. Board OKs ninth subdivision in Falls watershed - Se 22 83 1
9. Panel urges strictest limits in critical watershed areas - Se 23 83 1D
10. Runoff fuels problems in watersheds - Se 26 83 1C
11. Grimsley suggests watershed controls - Oc 8 83 1
12. Erosion of soil may kill farms, analysis shows (Upper Neuse River basin) - No 28 83 1C
13. Standards proposed for lake areas - No 29 83 1
14. Level of watershed growth controls debated - De 1 83 1C
15. Editorial: Water still needs saving - My 14 92 14A
16. EMC set to assign watershed categories - My 14 92 1
17. Watershed classifications (Chart) - My 14 92 12A
18. State adopts restrictions on watersheds - My 15 92 1B
19. Water plan puts panel on the spot; Some question cost of saving mussels - Jn 22 92 1B
20. Public hearings requested on watershed rules - Se 24 92 6B
21. Environmental groups seek more hearings (on watershed protections) - Oc 10 92 5B
22. Golf course (in Falls Lake watershed) plan slowed; Homeowners voice opposition - Oc 14 92 1B
23. Debate over runoff mires plans for links in Falls watershed - No 11 92 2B

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.