N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Advertising, Outdoor
Article(s) Referenced In:
- State orders rule review on billboards - Ja 25 89 1
- Revenue secretary to review taxation policy for billboards - Ja 26 89 1C
- Official (Powers) delays tax decision on billboards - Fe 3 89 6D
- Towns preserve vanishing vistas; Some scenic entries cluttered beyond help, but others can be
- saved - Fe 9 89 1T
- DOT finds 500 illegal billboards; N.C. probe uncovers signs without permits - Fe 10 89 1
- Records show official (Hutchens) let illegal sign stand - Fe 11 89 1C
- Billboard ordinance proposed - Fe 22 89 2C
- Task force targets sign loopholes, plans public hearing - Mr 3 89 24C
- New look at billboard-law challenge sought - Mr 30 89 3D
- State calls for billboard tax increase - Mr 30 89 1
- Zoning-lapse fines of $100 a day urged - Mr 30 89 1C
- Sign firm's complaint solvable, attorney says - Mr 31 89 2C
- DOT finds some government signs illegal - Ap 1 89 2C
- Foes prepare for billboard hearing; Industry, environmentalists to speak - Ap 12 89 4C
- Environmentalists, local officials request stricter billboard rules - Ap 13 89 3C
- Billboard moratorium, review of state regulations proposed - Ap 15 89 15A
- Editorial: Time-out on billboards - Ap 19 89 14A
- Billboard panel backs illegal-cutting penalty - Ap 25 89 18C
- Raleigh law on billboards is challenged - Ap 28 89 1C
- Panel recommends limits on billboards - My 2 89 1C
- Editorial: Bad signs for billboards - My 4 89 14A
- Billboard values (Chart) - My 12 89 11A
- Firms say signs worth more than tax value - My 12 89 1
- House OKs bill to change billboard law - My 12 89 11A
- Editorial: Billboard firms want it all - My 14 89 6D
- Raleigh wins round on signs; Federal magistrate advises against reopening challenge of law - My 26 89 22C
- Billboard proposals coming up; Panel to recommend sharp new limits - My 30 89 1
- Sign company (NAEGELE) pursuing suit halts contracts - Jn 17 89 1C
- Mavretic vote blocks weaker billboard fees - Jn 25 89 21A
- Editorial: Bad sign on billboards - Jn 27 89 10A
- House tentatively backs billboard-fee hike - Jn 28 89 18C
- House approves lower hikes in billboard fees - Jn 29 89 19A
- Bill to hike billboard fees advances - Jy 14 89 8A
- Senate panel to debate lottery bill (and other actions) - Jy 25 89 5A
- 300 illegal signs taken down; But lost records, other delays allow some longtime violators to
- stand - Se 1 89 1
- Panel rejects tougher controls on billboards - Se 1 89 4A
- Editorial: Keep heat on billboards - Se 5 89 10A
- Firm loses bid to reopen suit on billboards - Se 16 89 2C
- Panel denies key proposals to boost billboard law - Oc 2 89 1C
- Editorial: Retreat on billboards - Oc 3 89 10A
- Harrington defends transportation panel over billboard rules - Oc 7 89 4C
- Editorial: Harrington's bad signs - Oc 12 89 18A
- Billboard regulation endorsed; Proposals aim to halt illegal tree cutting - Oc 13 89 1
- New tax formula on billboards swells local government coffers - Oc 21 89 1
- Panel rejects sign ban on new rural roads - No 3 89 4C
- Billboard proposals advance; Panel OKs eased rural restrictions - De 1 89 1B
- Editorial: A failure on billboards - De 2 89 14A
- (Henderson County) Billboard ordinance is upheld by court (also Dunbar Corp. and Bamberger
- cases) - De 20 89 4B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!