N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Apportionment (Election Law) - Raleigh
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Lawyer wants redistricting suit dismissed - Mr 25 89 2C
- Council districts debated (Map) Je 16 89 1C
- Member says Raleigh council leaning toward compromise on voting districts - Jn 21 89 2C
- Raleigh's city attorney refuses to release letter on redistricting - Jn 24 89 3C
- City officials withholding council redistricting plan - Jn 28 89 4C
- Raleigh agrees to redrawing of districts; Blacks upset by electoral pact with GOP - Jn 30 89 1
- City unveils proposal for redistricting - Jy 1 89 1
- Editorial: Council's legacy of secrecy - Jy 1 89 18A
- Proposed City Council election districts (Map) - Jy 1 89 4A
- Council agrees to 2nd hearing on redistricting - Jy 6 89 1C
- Redistricting plan draws mixed reaction - Jy 12 89 1C
- Unified district lines sought by Wake GOP - Jy 18 89 1C
- City Council approves plan balancing voting districts - Jy 19 89 1
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!