N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Corporal Punishment
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Education board to support bill to develop alternatives to paddling - Mr 9 89 20A
- Editorial: - Spare the rod - for good - Mr 13 89 8A
- 16 systems could ban spanking for a time - Mr 15 89 11A
- No-spanking test bill backed by House panel - Mr 30 89 14C
- Amendment slows bill to ban school spanking - Ap 7 89 13A
- In party-line vote, panel backs day-care spanking ban - My 3 89 18C
- Panel backs bill to let schools ban spanking - Jn 1 89 16A
- Panel OKs spankings in church day-care centers - Jy 6 89 11A
- Editorial: - Spanking law: no exemptions - Jy 10 89 6A
- Spanking exemption for church day-care tentatively approved - Jy 12 89 16C
- Bill to ban spankings is defeated in House - Au 3 89 10A
- Day-care panel agrees to settle suit on spanking ban - Se 8 89 3C
- Policy may change day-care discipline to allow spanking - Se 9 89 3C
- Thornburg rejects day-care spanking settlement - Se 13 89 24A
- Tar Heel editors speak: - Spanking ban violates Constitution - Se 24 89 7D
- New battle brews over spanking ban in day-care centers - No 16 89 3C
- Action delayed on day-care spanking ban - No 17 89 5C
- Under the Dome: - Spanking debate sparks bias claim - No 22 89 1
- Paddling case is settled; School board agrees to pay couple $9,000 - No 29 89 3C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!