N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Dioxin
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Paper companies ask state to ease control on dioxin discharges - Mr 9 90 4B
- N.C. re-evaluates safe dioxin limits for humans who eat fish - Mr 14 90 4B
- Dioxin proposal criticized; Environmentalists seek to keep current limits - My 2 90 1B
- State may toughen limits on dioxin in fish - My 9 90 1B
- State division to oppose bid to relax dioxin rules - My 10 90 4B
- Study set on dioxin dangers; Paper firms withdraw higher-limit request - My 11 90 1B
- Fish caught in 3 rivers (Chowan; Trent; Neuse) may pose risk; State study cites possibility of dioxin - Jy 11 90 4B
- Dioxin in soil near Caldwell site no threat, EPA says - Au 16 90 4B
- Dioxin dangers debated; Panel backs weaker water protection rule - Au 17 90 1B
- Editorial: Don't mess with dioxin - Au 18 90 14A
- Warning urged on fish in 3 rivers with dioxin (Neuse; Roanoke; Chowan) - Se 8 90 4B
- State panel votes to keep stringent dioxin limit - Se 14 90 1B
- Editorial: Hanging tough on dioxin - Se 18 90 8A
- Warning issued on fish in areas of 3 rivers (Neuse; Chowan; Welch Creek) - Se 20 90 1B
- Fishing warning reduced; Shorter part of (Roanoke) river now under advisory - Se 22 90 1B
- Mills cited as dioxin threats; Paper industry, state officials criticize EPA study as out of date - Se 26 90 1B
- Fishermen decry dioxin warnings - Oc 2 90 1B
- State sets dioxin rules for 5 mills - Oc 16 90 3B
- Weyerhaeuser helping to block dioxin permit - No 22 90 3B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!