N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Hazardous Substances - Disposal

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Tar Heel editors speak: Barnwell's perspective on waste site - Jn 5 88 7D
2. Edgecombe waste site decision may set precedent, legislator says - Jn 6 88 6D
3. Editorial: Waste site miseries mount - Jn 9 88 18A
4. Legislators consider waste-site incentives - Jn 9 88 9A
5. Bill would protect communities from unwanted waste facilities - Jn 10 88 14A
6. Lee County wants no part of waste plant - Jn 13 88 1
7. Company (Golden Poultry) will cancel plant, seek damages if waste facility built - Jn 15 88 11A
8. House tentatively OKs moratorium on waste-site hunt - Jn 17 88 4C
9. Hundreds in Sanford rally against waste site - Jn 17 88 4C
10. Editorial: Wise retreat on wastes - Jn 18 88 12A
11. House votes to stall search for waste site - Jn 18 88 11A
12. Toxic-cleanup money to go to Randolph site - Jn 21 88 2C
13. Authority picks consulting firms to help locate suitable waste site - Jn 22 88 18C
14. Panel backs halting site search; waste bill heads for Senate floor - Jn 23 88 22A
15. Senate backs delay of search for waste site - Jn 24 88 1C
16. Panel halts consideration of Lee for waste treatment facility - Jn 25 88 1C
17. Tar Heel Editors Speak: State has no good alternative to radioactive waste compact - Jy 3 88 7D
18. N.C. is running out of places to put its trash - Jy 14 88 15A
19. Tar Heel editors speak: Speed up study of toxic waste sites - Jy 17 88 7D
20. Jones County meets privately on waste plant - Au 18 88 3C
21. Increase in toxic waste spurs plea for funds - Au 25 88 16C
22. Waste site search said to be flawed - Au 30 88 18C
23. Jones meeting planned on hazardous waste site - Au 31 88 4C
24. Jones County not ready to reject hazardous waste treatment plant - Se 1 88 22A
25. Caldwell County suit against state alleges incinerator hurt vegetation - Se 2 88 22C
26. Two companies submit waste facility proposals - Se 2 88 6B
27. Firms submit plans for building facility for low-level waste - Se 7 88 16C
28. Tar Heel editors speak: Politics over science in waste-site choice - Se 11 88 7D
29. Hazardous waste up 38% in '87; No Triangle counties among top-10 producers - Se 17 88 8D
30. Waste wrangle resurfaces; GOP house candidates focus on 'effectiveness' - Se 22 88 1T
31. Environmentalists say state exaggerated need for waste plant - Se 23 88 4C
32. Jones County drops waste-facility bid - Oc 4 88 3C
33. Companies present plans for waste disposal site - Oc 7 88 WA-1
34. S.C. restricts waste; N.C. may need plant - Oc 14 88 15A
35. N.C. low-level nuclear dump on schedule - Oc 26 88 6D
36. N.C. waste site cleanup could cost millions - Oc 28 88 1
37. Rutherford considering hosting waste plant - Oc 28 88 5D
38. Counties producing most waste reluctant to host treatment plant - No 14 88 2C
39. Panel finds 38% of state fit for low-level waste site (Map) - De 1 88 1C

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.