N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Hazardous Substances - Disposal

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Martin plans special session on waste issue - Se 6 89 1C
2. Editorial: Playing ball with poisons - Se 7 89 12A
3. NRC officials investigate spill at Duke Power plant - Se 9 89 3C
4. Caldwell board to try to close waste plant - Se 19 89 3C
5. Hazardous-waste plan endorsed; Southern governors discuss push in face of cutoff of federal
6. funds - Se 19 89 3C
7. Martin may cut trip short; Regional waste pact could interrupt plans - Se 22 89 3C
8. Hazardous waste pact jeopardized by Alabama move - Se 30 89 3C
9. Martin fails to sway Ala. governor on waste - Oc 1 89 25A
10. Hazardous-waste talks back 'on track'; Governor to depart on Asian trade trip - Oc 4 89 4C
11. State hears clock ticking on hazardous waste - Oc 6 89 3C
12. Bill could halt EPA's effort against state - Oc 7 89 13A
13. State works to stop probe into handling of hazardous waste - Oc 11 89 7C
14. EPA will get partial plan on N.C. waste - Oc 12 89 17A
15. State faces hazardous-waste deadline - Oc 17 89 1
16. N.C. advances plans to build waste facility - Oc 18 89 1C
17. EPA continues study of N.C. waste policy - Oc 19 89 3C
18. Local politics, Alabama election leave N.C. in limbo on wastes - Oc 19 89 1
19. State's search for waste treatment (Chronology) - Oc 19 89 6A
20. Martin to keep pushing state's waste-pact bid - Oc 20 89 1C
21. Editorial: Toxic waste bluff called - Oc 22 89 6D
22. State rebuts claims on toxic discharges - Oc 25 89 18C
23. Panel again delays naming possible low-level waste sites - Oc 26 89 19A
24. Martin seeks state landfill for toxic waste - Oc 27 89 1C
25. Waste site contenders' reactions mixed (Randolph, Chatham, Moore counties) - No 7 89 16C
26. 4 possible waste sites selected; Tract near Harris plant is on the list (Map) No 9 89 1
27. Counties' opposition to waste site varies No 9 89 14A
28. Radioactive wastes will leave traces long after plant closes No 9 89 14A
29. Martin still seeking regional waste pact No 10 89 7B
30. Pittsboro absorbs waste news No 10 89 1C
31. Under the Dome: Waste site search turns to ad effort No 10 89 1
32. N.C. radioactive-waste sites draw ire of S.C. lawmaker No 11 89 10B
33. Editorial: It has to go somewhere No 12 89 6D
34. Leaks found at Duke Forest waste site No 15 89 1C
35. Legal snag delays cleanup of NCSU nuclear dump site No 17 89 20C
36. Legislators protest areas for waste sites (Wake; Chatham, Rowan, Richmond, Union counties) - No 17 89 4C
37. Glaxo plans incinerator for complex No 18 89 2C
38. Battle looms over waste site; Four areas turn up noses at idea of low-level, radioactive dump - No 19 89 1
39. Design for N.C. low-level radioactive-waste facility (Plans) No 19 89 1
40. Tar Heel editors speak: Waste sites: what a coincidence No 19 89 7D
41. Drilling quietly begins at proposed waste site No 23 89 3C
42. N.C. added to regional waste pact No 23 89 1
43. Dumping fears plague radioactive-waste effort No 24 89 3C
44. Legislators seem warm to waste pact No 24 89 1C
45. Jordan Lake water fight called unlikely this year No 25 89 1C
46. Tar Heel editors speak: Nuclear waste site no disaster No 26 89 7D
47. Wake gets expert (Stam) to review waste site selection No 26 89 37A
48. Editorial: Growing up about waste No 27 89 8A
49. Stam denies representing counties in waste dispute No 27 89 2C
50. Martin begins pressing case for waste pact No 28 89 1C
51. Soil tests begin at proposed waste site (Union County) No 29 89 2C
52. Consequences of waste-pact rejection outlined No 30 89 5C
53. Hazardous-waste pact faces light opposition so far - De 1 89 3B

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.