N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Hazardous Waste Sites

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Hazardous waste recycling plant (Recontek) gets a warm welcome in Enfield - Ap 1 91 5B
2. Official's (Faison's) death alters incinerator issue - Ap 3 91 1B
3. Local solution favored in incinerator dispute - Ap 5 91 6B
4. Role of waste site group gains support - Ap 19 91 2B
5. Committee OKs putting pressure on waste pact - My 2 91 3B
6. Woodland officials vote to seek incinerator - My 4 91 1B
7. S.C. lawmaker opens new front in war over hazardous waste - My 5 91 1C
8. Little town (Woodland) seeking big role as waste site - My 7 91 1B
9. Waste incinerator attracts 3 other counties - My 14 91 4B
10. Race issue taints incinerator debate - My 18 91 1B
11. Tar Heel editors speak: Self-interest may save waste pact - My 19 91 7J
12. Pender County to hold hearings on incinerator - My 21 91 4B
13. Incinerator battle tearing (Northampton) county in two - My 27 91 1B
14. State bans on wastes rejected; Ruling spurs debate over incinerator - Jn 11 91 1
15. Legality of Pender incinerator vote in question; Court also bars Woodland action - Jn 11 91 4B
16. Incinerator provision (Woodland) fails on Senate floor - Jn 12 91 3B
17. Tracts picked for list of hazardous materials - Jn 12 91 4B
18. Pender board now free to discuss incinerator - Jn 15 91 4B
19. Alamance fights incinerator threat - Jn 19 91 4B
20. Judge limits report's release to attorneys (assessment of Chem-Nuclear Systems) - Jn 22 91 4B
21. Press groups seek waste site reports - Jn 29 91 5B
22. Chatham consultant faults plan to study waste site - Jy 3 91 7B
23. State allegedly tried to hurry Pender waste vote - Jy 3 91 7B
24. Town's (Woodland's) waste site bid gets boost from judge - Jy 4 91 4B
25. Editorial: Public dollars, public reports - Jy 5 91 8A
26. Secret report shows politics in waste site; PR firm rated counties on opposition - Jy 7 91 1C
27. Tar Heel editors speak: Nuclear waste site secrecy - Jy 7 91 7J
28. Editorial: Waste sites and hindsight - Jy 10 91 10A
29. Northampton officials hop to bar incinerator - Jy 10 91 3B
30. State got waste site strategy; Report in 1988 urged public relations effort - Jy 11 91 1B
31. Martin says waste-site (political assessment) reports a 'mistake' - Jy 12 91 6B
32. Panel moves to repeal provision on waste site - Jy 16 91 4B
33. Poll disputes notion that folks in Pender support incinerator - Jy 23 91 5B
34. Waste site plan advances; Woodland to annex land for incinerator - Jy 24 91 5B
35. Under the Dome: Waste dump facts vital, lobbyist says - Jy 29 91 1B
36. Legislators question waste-site selection - Au 5 91 1B
37. Former Helms aide (Moore) helping incinerator bid - Au 7 91 1B
38. Pender voters get to say yes or no on incinerator - Au 8 91 4B
39. Nuclear waste and the bug letter - Au 11 91 7J
40. ThermalKEM says sites not suitable for landfill (Pender and Northampton counties) - Au 15 91 5B
41. Woodland now alone in seeking incinerator; Pender leaders reverse county quest for facility - Au 18 91 1C
42. Hazardous-waste battle limited; Supreme Court restricts lower courts from blocking site studies - Au 20 91 5B
43. Search for waste site narrows - Au 22 91 5B
44. Judge hints he'll reject claims against waste-site search - Se 5 91 8B
45. Judge not buying argument on cost of waste dump delays - Se 19 91 2B
46. Judge won't block tests; Work continues at low-level site - Se 21 91 1B
47. Waste finalist choice (Wake-Chatham) faulted; Foes say papers show political taint - Se 25 91 1B
48. Incinerator issue splits Woodland along ragged lines - Se 29 91 1
49. Waste hearing set for eve of election - Oc 1 91 2B
50. 235

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.