N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Hazardous Waste Sites

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Decision delayed on waste site rules - Ja 26 85 16C
2. Waste treatment site rules OK'd by panel - Fe 1 85 3D
3. EPA takes charge of chemicals removed from storage facility - Fe 2 85 18C
4. Lawmakers impatient on delayed plan for wastes, told shipments far in future - Fe 28 85 6B
5. General Assembly Round-up: Waste (state slow in establishing sites) - Mr 21 85 18A
6. Some nuclear waste sites not suitable, report says - Mr 23 85 4C
7. General Assembly Round-up: Radioactive waste (should be in counties with nuclear power plants) - Ap 11 85 7A
8. General Assembly Round-up: Hazardous waste dumps - My 16 85 14A
9. Residents scoff at hazardous-waste plant plans (Scotland County) - My 16 85 4C
10. General Assembly Round-up: Nuclear waste - My 18 85 5B
11. Waste plant to be built in Greensboro - Jy 19 85 4D
12. Laurinburg group opposes firm's plans for hazardous waste treatment plant - Jy 28 85 18A
13. N.C. among states considered for radioactive dump site - Oc 6 85 33A
14. Possible radioactive waste sites (Map) - Oc 6 85 33A
15. Council of State urges caution on OK of waste treatment units - No 7 85 20A
16. Radioactive waste dump site selection stirs controversy in North Carolina - De 1 85 1
17. N.C. to need more waste treatment sites, expert says - De 6 85 7B
18. Wake-Franklin area candidate for burial of nuclear waste - De 6 85 1D
19. Officials promise to fight nuclear waste dump site - De 7 85 4C
20. Groups consider urging Martin to monitor selection of waste site - De 18 85 2C
21. Under the dome: Martin opposes dump site despite prior vote - De 25 85 1
22. Suits may affect selection of nuclear dump site - De 29 85 25A

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.