N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Hazardous Waste Sites

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. 30% of state is found unsuitable for waste site - Ja 5 90 4B
2. Areas not suitable for a hazardous-waste site (Map) - Ja 5 90 4B
3. Thornburg orders investigation into possible site-search leaks - Ja 10 90 3B
4. Union citizens oppose local site for waste - Ja 11 90 4B
5. Hazardous waste venture may go to private firm - Ja 16 90 4B
6. Population density won't limit waste site search - Ja 17 90 5B
7. Tar Heel editors speak: Not clean enough for dirty job - Ja 21 90 7J
8. Richmond County land owner sparks waste-site worries (Map) - Ja 22 90 1
9. Waste site locations narrowed; Only 3-5% of state fit for regional plant - Ja 24 90 1
10. Tiny fish could save Richmond from hazardous waste project - Ja 25 90 4B
11. Legislators urge Wake site for facility - Ja 30 90 3B
12. Richmond seeks to delay private waste plant - Fe 3 90 6B
13. Under the Dome: SBI finds no leak in waste-site search - Fe 10 90 1B
14. Waste panel drowning in documents; 6 firms meet deadline for environmental data - Fe 14 90 6B
15. Map helps narrow waste sites; state eliminates 55 percent of N.C. land in search for depository (Map) - Fe 16 90 3B
16. Wake likely choice for waste site - Fe 21 90 1
17. Editorial: Radioactive resting place - Fe 22 90 16A
18. Wake/Chatham site (Maps) - Fe 22 90 14A
19. Waste site wins support; Wake County one of two finalists for nuclear waste facility - Fe 22 90 1
20. Waste site called corporate attraction - Fe 23 90 1B
21. Waste site losing commissioner support - Fe 27 90 1B
22. Candidates say Wake board too slow in opposing waste site - Mr 2 90 2B
23. Firm drops out of contention for waste plant - Mr 4 90 2C
24. Chatham seeks fair cut of waste-site benefits - Mr 5 90 1B
25. Wake board votes to oppose waste site - Mr 6 90 1B
26. Editorial: Wake ducks on waste...but wouldn't mind money - Mr 7 90 12A
27. Radioactive-waste panel postpones vote on sites - Mr 7 90 3B
28. Concerns over search process slow waste site selection - Mr 15 90 1B
29. Waste site list trimmed by 2; Wake-Chatham tract still being considered - Mr 20 90 3B
30. Firm must submit plan before testing site - Mr 29 90 4B
31. State waste report is similar to company's press releases - Mr 29 90 3B
32. Tar Heel editors speak: More 'living room' for waste - Ap 1 90 7J
33. Three firms to compete for hazardous waste site - Ap 4 90 4B
34. Who will operate N.C.'s Incinerator? (Chart) - Ap 4 90 4B
35. Group questions the records of bidders for waste project - Ap 6 90 6B
36. Stricter regulation of waste sites urged - Ap 9 90 3B
37. Piedmont suitable for waste site; Panel says Durham, Wake still options - Ap 11 90 1B
38. Potential hazardous waste incinerator sites in N.C. (Map) - Ap 11 90 1B
39. Under the Dome: Primary may delay waste site decision - Ap 25 90 1B
40. Potential hazardous-waste sites in N.C. (Maps) - Ap 27 90 2B
41. Wake site on list of 18 for incinerator - Ap 27 90 1B
42. Letter angers Chatham; Wake-Chatham site believed ahead, Martin writes - Ap 28 90 1
43. Wake/Chatham, Richmond sites chosen low-level waste finalists - My 1 90 3B
44. Granville site is one of two on incinerator list (also Iredell-Rowan County line site) - My 2 90 1
45. Judge (Cornelius) temporarily blocks incinerator plan (on Rowan-Iredell border) - My 11 90 4B
46. Court orders delay; Could affect states hazardous waste pact - My 18 90 1B
47. Judge extends restriction on N.C. waste-site panel - My 22 90 3B
48. Harris site is unsuitable, geologist says - My 23 90 5B
49. Waste panel chairman, director told to testify (about Iredell-Rowan site) - My 23 90 4B
50. Panel makes fresh stab at waste-site plans - My 25 90 5B
51. Landowners get letters about waste plant - My 26 90 4B
52. Tar Heel editors speak: Waste assumptions unfounded - My 27 90 7J
53. Many challenges, changes mark search for waste site - Jn 3 90 11A
54. Extensive testing to begin soon at 2 proposed N.C. waste sites (Richmond and Wake-Chatham sites) - Jn 4 90 3B
55. Rowan mulls huge tax to combat waste plant - Jn 6 90 4B
56. Sponsor withdraws bill on waste site selection - Jn 8 90 3B
57. Granville tries to halt site testing - Jn 12 90 5B
58. Hamlet hopes honor will block waste site - Jn 13 90 4B
59. Judge (Hobgood) drops order on Granville site - Jn 15 90 7B
60. Waste site faces delay, agency's director says - Jn 15 90 3B
61. Judge stops evaluation of waste incinerator site (Granville Co.) - Jn 20 90 2B
62. Waste-site studies to evaluate unknowns - Jn 21 90 4B
63. Court lifts incinerator injunction (Granville Co.) - Jn 23 90 4B
64. Governor may skip site tests; Martin seeks to avoid waste facility protests - Jn 29 90 1
65. State funds, staff for hazardous waste site are questioned - Jn 29 90 1B
66. Siting of hazardous waste facility is better negotiated than forced - Jn 30 90 15A
67. Restoring low-level fund urged; Official sees delay in finding waste site - Jy 3 90 1B
68. Editorial: High-level waste of time - Jy 6 90 12A
69. Judge to hear debate on testing of Granville land for incinerator - Jy 6 90 5B
70. State loses its attempt to subpoena (Rowan-Iredell) landowners - Jy 6 90 4B
71. Incinerator test ban is continued; Official warns state could miss deadline - Jy 7 90 1B
72. Judge lifts Iredell test restraining order - Jy 7 90 5B
73. Court bars state from Iredell property - Jy 11 90 5B
74. Senate panel OKs bill for waste inspectors - Jy 11 90 3B
75. Incinerator land tests debated; Blocked site access limits state options - Jy 12 90 1B
76. Granville's study report says waste site unfit - Jy 13 90 4B
77. Martin admits he wouldn't want to live near hazardous waste site - Jy 13 90 3B
78. Radioactive waste site to be delayed - Jy 14 90 1
79. Bill would limit size of planned waste site - Jy 18 90 3B
80. Bill on waste-plant size is approved in Senate - Jy 19 90 3B
81. State delayed again in testing proposed incinerator site - Jy 19 90 4B
82. Waste firm seeks early start - Jy 21 90 3B
83. Waste site rule change suggested: Panel could skip tests if Martin OKs proposal - Jy 24 90 1
84. Incinerator near Lenoir called threat; Workers, residents to be tested (CALDWELL SYSTEMS INC.) - Jy 26 90 1
85. Editorial: State incinerates trust - Jy 27 90 16A
86. Low-level waste delay concerns state agency - Jy 27 90 3B
87. Martin assures safety of incinerator - Jy 27 90 14A
88. Type of incinerator recommended for North Carolina - Jy 27 90 14A
89. Search for waste incinerator site must move ahead, Martin says - Jy 28 90 1
90. Court lifts orders blocking testing sites for incinerator - Jy 29 90 4C
91. Panel to consider variety of routes in picking waste site - Jy 30 90 3B
92. Incinerator operator (Foushee) kept cooperative image - Au 1 90 1B
93. Wetlands at potential Granville waste site (Map) - Au 8 90 2B
94. Injunctions likely to slow site selection; Judge prevents adoption of new incinerator rules - Au 9 90 1B
95. County officials favor incinerator on state land - Au 11 90 4B
96. Gardner remains split with Martin on incinerator - Au 21 90 3B
97. Taxpayers pay $7,000 for ads on hazardous-waste questions - Au 21 90 4B
98. Editorial: Martin's waste mandate - Au 23 90 16A
99. Waste generators may pay more; Extra fees from companies would help finance N.C. disposal facility - Au 25 90 3B
100. Officials, foes dispute waste site status - Au 30 90 1B
101. Editorial: Burning waste, cold shoulders - Se 2 90 6J
102. States' planned waste capacity called excessive - Se 6 90 1B
103. Royall says Granville unfit for incinerator - Se 13 90 3B
104. Hazardous-waste site incentives tempt officials in Tyrrell (Map) - Se 14 90 1
105. State had dropped Tyrrell as potential site - Se 14 90 11A
106. Tyrrell officials send Martin their wish-list - Se 19 90 2B
107. Martin accepts Tyrrell incinerator wish list - Se 20 90 4B
108. Tyrrell County officials drop bid to host hazardous waste site - Se 25 90 1
109. N.C. leaders have picked 2 waste sites (Richmond and Wake-Chatham counties) - Se 30 90 8A
110. State land preferred for waste; Panel drops private sites from its list - Oc 3 90 1
111. Butner site may not be suited for hazardous-waste landfill - Oc 4 90 3B
112. Rare flower could stall waste site - Oc 5 90 1B
113. Test drills set at Umstead site - Oc 10 90 4B
114. Judge orders halt to waste site tests - Oc 12 90 3B
115. Court lifts waste-site ruling - Oc 13 90 4B
116. Legislator wants state to rethink waste plan; Granville representative asks Martin to reconvene General Assembly - Oc 15 90 3B
117. Court refuses to let state drill at Granville site - Oc 16 90 5B
118. Meeting will examine pros, cons of incinerator - Oc 17 2B
119. Waste site tests to be completed; Judge lifts order that halted drilling at farm - Oc 17 1B
120. Judge OKs drilling by waste engineers at Camp Butner site - Oc 18 90 4B
121. State geologists' report cites flaws in low-level radioactive waste site - Oc 18 90 4B
122. Flower may stymie incinerator - Oc 19 90 4B
123. Incinerator is called no threat to patients; No evacuations seen at Butner facilities - Oc 19 90 4B
124. Soil tests OK Johnston farm for site, firm says - Oc 20 90 5B
125. Flaws cited in state-owned incinerator sites - No 8 90 6B
126. Hazards waste panel focuses on Granville - No 9 90 5B
127. Panel imposes fees on firms to help fund low-level facility - No 16 90 4B
128. Speakers favor effective rules on incinerators - No 21 90 4B
129. Council of State leaning against Granville waste site - No 27 90 1
130. Experts discuss safety of waste incineration - No 29 90 4B
131. Judge OKs site selection; Hazardous waste body meets today - De 4 90 1B
132. Panel picks Butner waste site; State proposal does not include planned landfill - De 5 90 1
133. N.C. will miss incinerator date; S.C. says ban on waste is likely - De 6 90 1B
134. Incinerator wouldn't take foreign wastes - De 11 90 5B
135. S.C., Ala. governors warn state on wastes - De 11 90 1
136. Editorial: Waste: Reality knocks - De 12 90 16A
137. Valentine asks council to deny transfer of Butner waste site - De 12 90 4B
138. Legislative panel sidesteps waste issue - De 13 90 1B
139. Council vetoes waste site; Action blocks hazardous-waste facility in Granville - De 14 90 1
140. Angry Martin blasts council for waste vote - De 15 90 1
141. Editorial: Council flunks test - De 16 90 6J
142. S.C. sets waste ban for N.C.; Incinerator site rejection cited in move - De 18 90 1
143. Waste-panel leader (Turner) criticizes Thornburg; Attorney general's motives challenged - De 19 90 1
144. Northampton County studying whether to take waste complex - De 21 90 1
145. Judge blocks S.C. ban on waste - De 22 90 4B
146. Northampton taken by surprise; County's residents startled, confused by prospect of incinerator - De 22 90 1B
147. Waste site offer has conditions; County wants firm to seek permit first - De 22 90 1B
148. Waste-site authority proposed for council - De 22 90 4B
149. Tar Heel editors speak: For Butner, enough's enough - De 23 90 7J
150. Northampton residents to discuss waste complex - De 25 90 4B
151. Radioactive waste site hunt trudges along - De 31 90 1B

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.