N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Hazardous Waste Sites - Opposition
Article(s) Referenced In:
- 800 sign petition against waste site (in Wake and Chatham counties) - Ja 17 90 2B
- County residents protest waste sites (Richmond, Montgomery, Moore counties) - Ja 23 90 3B
- 1,000 protest hazardous-waste plan (Montgomery County) - Ja 29 90 4B
- Opponents dumped from meeting - Fe 22 90 1B
- New foes boost ranks against waste facility - Fe 23 90 1
- Chatham citizens loud in rejection of waste site - Fe 28 90 1B
- Foes of possible waste site speak out in Fuquay-Varina Mar 2 90 1B
- Triangle J opposes low-level facility - Mr 8 90 2B
- Foes of waste site seek support in S.C. - Ap 30 90 3B
- Foes of N.C. waste site take last stand - My 1 90 1B
- Wake board opposes building of waste facility - My 1 90 2B
- Some never heard of incinerator, but don't want it in Granville - My 2 90 8A
- Granville vows to fight incinerator complex - My 4 90 4B
- Statesville meeting fails to calm anger of waste-site foes - My 8 90 3B
- Two counties (Wake; Chatham) unite against waste facility - My 9 90 7B
- Rally protests waste facility plans - My 24 90 1B
- Granville waste meet disrupted; Cans, coffee grounds thrown on commission - My 31 90 4B
- Waste panel protection is requested; Granville incident spurs escorts by SBI, patrol - Jn 1 90 1B
- Troopers stand guard at hearings; Escorts attend forums on hazardous waste - Jn 2 90 4B
- Waste message spreads; Granville unites to protest site - Jn 3 90 1
- Opponents question state's waste site search - Jn 11 90 1B
- Granville tries to halt site testing - Jn 12 90 5B
- 500 at 'canceled' hearing in Granville on waste site - Jn 13 90 6B
- Democrats resolve to oppose incinerator - Jn 18 90 1B
- Editorial: NIMBY reflex rides again (Not in My Back Yard) - Jn 19 90 8A
- Wake Forest opposes incinerator site - Jn 23 90 2B
- Waste-complex foes keep workers away from 2 sites (Map) - Jn 27 90 1
- Panel to discuss incinerator opposition - Jn 28 90 1B
- Asthma camp doctor protests siting incinerator in Granville - Jy 6 90 4B
- Incinerator assurances can't placate opponents - Jy 8 90 1C
- Waste-site opponents lose bid to limit search - Jy 11 90 1B
- Rallying against waste site (Photo) - Jy 17 90 3B
- Under the Dome: Legislator worried about waste fight - Jy 20 90 1B
- Flurry of lawsuits hinders state effort on incinerator sites - Jy 21 90 4B
- Waste-site foes fault new rules; Martin aides weigh proposed changes - Jy 25 90 1B
- Valentine fights Granville option; Martin delays decision on rules - Jy 26 90 15A
- Balentine fighting waste site; Granville wetlands may not stop facility - Au 8 90 1B
- Stock car hero Dale Earnhardt joins fight against incinerator - Au 17 90 5B
- Incinerator foes show new style; Three counties' representatives coolly pick apart site selection - Au 18 90 1B
- Martin facing hard stares in Iredell; Possible waste site angers his neighbors - Au 31 90 3B
- Wrestler (Andre the Giant) puts weight behind waste-site fight - Se 7 90 4B
- Tyrrell site would face string of environmental hurdles - Se 15 90 3B
- Waste proposal not winning converts in Tyrrell - Se 15 90 1B
- Waste panel to test 2 sites on state land; Granville, Johnston picked for study; counties upset - Se 18 90 1
- Protest vowed at state-owned Granville site - Se 19 90 1B
- Waste-site protesters arrested; Butner officers charge 29 with trespassing on state-owned land - Se 20 90 1
- 16 more arrested in Granville protest against incinerator - Se 21 90 1B
- Plant's foes protest; Granville hearing draws angry crowd - Se 21 90 1
- 18 more protesters arrested - Se 22 90 3B
- Johnston commissioners officially oppose incinerator - Se 22 90 3B
- Granville residents halt protests after waste site tests completed - Se 23 90 6C
- Martin paying price for waste decisions - Se 23 90 1C
- As nasty as they want to be; Incinerator issue makes activists of a diverse group - Se 24 90 1C
- Gantt opposes state's search for waste facility - Se 25 90 3B
- Wake, Clayton boards reject waste site plans - Se 25 90 4B
- Court consolidates suits filed over incinerator site - Se 28 90 3B
- Groups take waste battle past their own back yards - Se 30 90 1C
- Incinerator panel finds heated criticism blends into abuse - Oc 1 90 1B
- Johnstonians picket mansion (Photo) - Oc 2 90 3B
- Tar Heel editors speak: - No room in Johnston for incinerator - Oc 7 90 7J
- Judge sets guidelines for protest - Oc 20 90 2B
- Thousands protest incinerator; Marchers say they speak for hospital patients - Oc 21 90 1C
- Editorial: An ugly form of protest - Oc 23 90 12A
- Durham leaders join Granville in protest against incinerator - Oc 26 90 4B
- (Wake) Commissioners oppose waste site near Butner - Oc 30 90 2B
- Chatham officials sue waste authority over site selection - No 1 90 4B
- Group alleges pressure against waste site foes - No 6 90 4B
- Upchurch urges resolution against waste site - No 6 90 2B
- Council speaks out against waste incinerator - No 7 90 2B
- Hazardous-waste incinerator foes want to stem problem at source - No 12 90 1B
- Waste-site fight moves to Wake - No 17 90 5B
- Granville files suit to block incinerator site selection - No 22 90 4B
- Agriculture chief vows to fight waste incinerator at state farm - No 23 90 3B
- Under the Dome: Granville panel furious over tape - No 23 90 1B
- Martin criticizes state leaders' stand against Butner site - No 28 90 1B
- Editorial: - No help from Graham - No 29 90 20A
- 300 sign Butner letter protesting incinerator - No 30 90 4B
- Court asked to block move for incinerator at Butner - No 30 90 4B
- Incinerator foes' trespass charges pulled - De 7 90 5B
- Tar Heel editors speak: Wrong site for incinerator - De 9 90 7J
- State's town: It took POWs and a prison; Butner now draws the line - De 12 90 1
- 3 commissioners oppose incinerator - De 27 90 1B
- Stubborn crowd gets hearing postponed; Northampton County waste site on table - De 28 90 1B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!