N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Real Estate Development - Raleigh

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Planners back development on New Leesville Boulevard (Map) - Ja 12 89 2C
2. Runoff ponds or fees urged for developers - Fe 1 89 1C
3. Old Stone to take over 2 projects (Capital Center & Waverly Place) - Fe 9 89 5B
4. Protection for Umstead Park focus of battle - Fe 14 89 1C
5. Leesville Road rezoning backed by panel (Map) - Fe 16 89 1C
6. Editorial: Protecting a Triangle treasure (Umstead State Park) - Fe 17 89 14A
7. Officials struggle to preserve Umstead; Developers resist Raleigh plan to slow growth, create
8. buffer zone for park - Fe 27 89 1
9. Mangums make an upscale community of olde; Olde Raleigh had extravagant investment in site
10. improvement - Mr 5 89 1F
11. Cobey urges Raleigh City Council to limit growth near Umstead park - Mr 10 89 20C
12. Lakeside building opposed (White Oak Lake; Map) - Mr 22 89 2C
13. Land near Neuse, U.S. 1 backed for intense development zoning (Map) - Ap 13 89 1
14. Making developers adapt to land called unworkable - Ap 27 89 1C
15. Council waters down Umstead protections - Jn 21 89 1
16. Editorial: At the mercy of a hard rain (Umstead state Park) - Jn 26 89 6A
17. 2 Wake County towns fence for last big building frontier (Map) - Jy 6 89 1C
18. Planning panel votes against Crabtree Creek subdivision (Map) - Oc 26 89 2C
19. Updated plan for city backed; developers howl - No 10 89 1C
20. Landowners fear city will take property (Maps) - No 16 89 1C
21. Landowners seek exemption from Umstead buffer (Map) - De 5 89 1B
22. Panel splits in backing subdivision - De 12 89 2B
23. Eckerd project endorsed; But Five Points plan called ugly, ordinary - De 14 89 1B
24. Prebuilt homes upset neighbors in Raleigh - De 14 89 1B
25. Developers studied architectural history for Oakwood Green - De 31 89 1E

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.