N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Real Estate Development - Wake County
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Planned subdivisions in paths of roads (Map) - Ja 3 90 1B
- Wake attorney's office to review subdivision plans - Ja 4 90 2B
- Only written road plans can block proposed subdivisions, attorney says - Mr 8 90 6B
- Accords sought on development in Swift Creek basin (Map) - Mr 19 90 4B
- Subdivisions OK'd in path of bypass - Mr 22 90 2B
- Wake seeks to compel road paving; Staff is told to draft changes in rules governing developers - Ap 12 90 1F
- Developer asked to make room for Outer Loop - Ap 19 90 5B
- Wake planners approve 2 subdivisions - Ap 19 90 2B
- Outer Loop development list grows - My 5 90 2B
- Planning Board approves 2 projects (Little River Run & Bishopsgate subdivisions) - My 22 90 2B
- Wake delegation drops developers fee bill - Jn 6 90 3B
- Missing lot a puzzle to board (Map) - Jn 21 90 5B
- County targets scofflaws; Wake is searching for ways to buttress its subdivision law - Jy 19 90 1F
- U.S. 401 plans concern some Wake residents - Jy 20 90 5B
- Developers seeking sewer line to serve property near I-40 - Au 23 90 3B
- Changes in U.S. 64 plan prompt fears of more strip development - Se 15 90 1B
- Bulldozers may alter watershed; Landowner proposes changing lay of land - Se 26 90 1B
- City aims to stem erosion's upsurge with basin studies; Officials seek to limit impact of development - No 26 90 1B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!