N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Roads - Raleigh
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Boulevard plan would neaten Raleigh road; Appearance Commission backs spruce-up - Ja 16 88 3C
- Report from bank paves way for road (New Hope Church ext.) - Ja 21 88 7D
- (Temple Beth Or) Congregation pushing to keep left-turn option (Creedmoor Rd.) - Fe 10 88 1C
- Carpool lanes won't be used on wider I-40; But study says Raleigh-RTP link should have lanes by
- mid-1990s - Fe 25 88 1C
- Creedmoor Road project OK'd; Raleigh, state reach agreement on widening another section - Mr 12 88 1C
- Plans for wider Beltline give City Council pause - Mr 16 88 1C
- Glen Eden Drive link to open after two years of dispute - Mr 18 88 5D
- Developer opposes Creedmoor median - Mr 24 88 2T
- Traffic relief en route (Atlantic Ave.) - Mr 24 88 2T
- City halts road construction when developer (BRIGGS) refuses to pay - Ap 1 88 1C
- Road construction beside office site to start up again - Ap 5 88 2C
- Atlantic Avenue finished - Ap 7 88 1
- Panel considers traffic control on Atlantic Ave. - Ap 13 88 4C
- Raleigh works on wish list for TIP state road funds - Ap 21 88 6T
- Widening of roads sought - Ap 22 88 1C
- State to challenge cost of city's Beltline plans - Ma 3 88 1C
- Beltline widening debated at meeting - Ma 4 88 2C
- Editorial: Sprucing up the Beltline - Ma 5 88 14A
- Plan would vary Beltline median according to type of area nearby - Ma 12 88 2C
- Panel asks Raleigh to develop program to protect trees along major roadways - Jy 1 88 1C
- Designers say Beltline plan unsafe, unhelpful; Transportation officials answer money lacking for
- better option - Jy 3 88 1
- Council members oppose DOT plan for Beltline - Jy 7 88 1
- Editorial: A blueprint for danger - Jy 7 88 16A
- Beltline squeeze put on Raleigh; DOT tells city to support plan or wait on work - Jy 9 88 1
- Beltline directive rejected; City Council panel wants alternate plan - Jy 12 88 1
- Editorial: - No tightening the Beltline - Jy 12 88 10A
- Lack of inner breakdown lane for Beltline risky, experts say - Jy 13 88 1
- Editorial: Safety on the line - Jy 15 88 16A
- Sherrybrook's south end will close forever - Jy 19 88 2C
- Raleigh council rejects Beltline plan, tries to keep project alive - Jy 20 88 1
- Triangle drivers aren't only ones with stake in Beltline - Jy 20 88 11A
- Argument in Raleigh should concern all North Carolinians - Jy 21 88 15A
- Editorial: Beyond the Beltline - Jy 21 88 14A
- Rejection of Beltline plan likely to delay widening - Jy 21 88 1C
- Martin says Beltline compromise possible; Breakdown lanes may be added to design - Jy 22 88 1
- Hillsborough Street plan advancing - Jy 28 88 1C
- Former mayors back rejection of Beltline plan - Au 1 88 1C
- State preparing 5 Beltline plans; delays expected - Au 2 88 1C
- City Council rejects immediate talks on widening of Beltline - Au 3 88 1C
- Raleigh, DOT plan Beltline meetings soon - Au 4 88 1C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!