N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Shore Protection
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Panel may rethink ban on beach-hardening structures (SHORE PROTECTION) - Fe 2 91 4B
- Topsail Beach still pushing for anti-erosion groin - Mr 20 91 4B
- Coastal panel delays vote on easing structure rules (seawalls, etc.) - Mr 22 91 1B
- Long Beach might try 'dewatering' process - Mr 26 91 4B
- Battle launched to save Civil War FORT (FISHER) from sea - Mr 28 91 1B
- Tar Heel editors speak: Trojan horse for Topsail Beach - Mr 31 91 7J
- CRC chief seeks to soften seawall ban - Jn 14 91 3B
- Editorial: Time, tide and Mr. Harrington - Jn 17 91 6A
- State's strict seawall ban is finding favor elsewhere - Jy 22 91 5A
- Editorial: Hold fast on the coast - Jy 24 91 10A
- Panel keeps seawall ban; Proposal to ease tough state regulation is dropped - Jy 27 91 1
- Fort may skirt ban on seawalls - Jy 31 91 5B
- Editorial: Commission, and ocean, say no - Au 1 91 10A
- Tar Heel editors speak: Long Beach is too poor to help - Se 8 91 7J
- Law will limit drivers on N. Topsail Beach - Se 21 91 5B
- Coastal officials seek aid; New storm poses threat to dunes - No 8 91 5B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!