N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Super Collider

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Super collider panel likes Texas proposal, study says - Ja 3 88 29A
2. Evaluation revealed on super collider bid - Ja 5 88 5B
3. State council gives collider bid $260,000 boost - Ja 6 88 6D
4. Super collider site assessments puzzle state officials - Ja 21 88 14A
5. North Carolina among 7 finalists for Superconducting Super Collider - Ja 20 88 1
6. Super collider not super to all - Ja 24 88 1
7. Landowners receive letters about super collider - Ja 29 88 1C
8. Landowners to be told who's in collider's path - Fe 4 88 10B
9. Residents learn collider may hit close to home - Fe 5 88 1C
10. Super collider sales pitch not hitting home - Fe 8 88 1C
11. Martin addresses collider fears - Fe 10 88 1C
12. Under the Dome: Super collider tour set (Illinois) - Fe 19 88 6A
13. Martin to plead case in Durham for collider - Fe 21 88 36A
14. Reagan budget a mixed blessing to N.C.; Super collider could boost state, but cut in sewer grants
15. would hurt - Fe 21 88 37A
16. Person residents told they'd get fair value for collider property - Fe 23 88 4C
17. Martin: Collider could be shifted - Fe 24 88 5C
18. Selection of site for super collider delayed - Fe 24 88 5C
19. Collider has Rougemont 'ill, aggravated' - Mr 7 88 1C
20. 3-county group tours Illinois collider project - Mr 12 88 3C
21. Commissioners wary of super collider's effects on region - Mr 13 88 40A
22. Collider is opposed in Durham: Durham board votes against $4.4 billion plan - Mr 15 88 1
23. Durham collider vote shows desire for data (SUPER COLLIDER) - Mr 16 88 1
24. Watkins withdraws support for collider - Mr 17 88 1C
25. Martin fails to sway Watkins on (SUPER) COLLIDER - Mr 18 88 1C
26. Durham legislator (Miller) wavers on support for SUPER COLLIDER - Mr 19 88 10B
27. Legislator opposes (SUPER) COLLIDER; Rep. Michaux vows not to vote for funds - Mr 22 88 1C
28. Collider views put on record; Supporters and foes speak on proposal - Mr 23 88 1C
29. Congress is having second thoughts about super collider - Mr 27 88 12A
30. Illinois behind collider, but dissent voiced - Mr 27 88 13A
31. Scientists debate collider's merit - Mr 27 88 1
32. (SUPER) COLLIDER's investment value weighed; Legislators consider balance of benefits
33. against expense, opposition - Mr 28 88 8A
34. Predicted benefits of collider challenged - Mr 28 88 1

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.