N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Utilities Commission, North Carolina
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Phone companies dispute value put on leasing business - Ja 5 88 3C
- Local telephone rates ordered cut in N. C. - Ja 6 88 6D
- Agency (Utilities Commission) seeks more data on area phone plan - Ja 15 88 20C
- PUBLIC STAFF (Utilities Commission) backs study of local Triangle calling - Ja 29 88 1C
- Triangle firms oppose extending local phone service to all users - Fe 13 88 1
- Panel orders CP&L to refund $4.1 million - Mr 1 88 3C
- Program to help Tar Heels who can't afford phones - Mr 5 88 12A
- Coalition urges utilities panel to hold off on new power plants - Mr 8 88 18C
- State rejects (consumer and environmental) groups' call to ban new power plants, lines - Mr 15 88 3C
- N.C. probes alternative phone plans (for hotels, motels, pay phones) - Mr 17 88 20A
- Hearing set on CP&L rate proposal - Ap 3 88 35A
- Consumers at hearing respond to Harris plant costs - Ap 5 88 1C
- Panel orders waiver of fee to halt 976 calls; Utilities Commission says consumers shouldn't pay to
- block services - Ap 5 88 1C
- Costs of Triangle-wide calling to be studied by area's utilities - Ap 8 88 22C
- Inquiry will test CP&L decisions on Harris plant - Ap 10 88 29A
- N.C. Utilities Commission (sketches of members) - Ap 10 88 37A
- CP&L officials will defend handling of nuclear plant building at hearing - Ap 14 88 5B
- CP&L officials defend expense of Harris plant - Ap 15 88 1C
- Studies for CP&L in '75 looked at consequences of canceling 2 reactors - Ap 16 88 12A
- CP&L: Full hike could guarantee stability in rates - Ap 19 88 1C
- Small gas rate hike approved for state - Ap 26 88 3C
- Panel orders CP&L refund in June bills - Ma 5 88 16C
- Chatham seeks place in regional telephone plan - Ma 10 88 8B
- Natural gas bills for some customers will rise - Ma 10 88 1C
- Tiny decrease proposed for CP&L users - Ma 12 88 12B
- Engineers, CP&L dispute impact of delay on N-plant - Ma 20 88 24C
- Duke Power chief defends push to diversify - Ma 24 88 2C
- CP&L responds to accusations of mishandling N-plant building - Jn 1 88 18C
- CP&L rate hike hearing hitting record length - Jn 8 88 18C
- CP&L, Utilities Commission both on trial - Jn 11 88 11A
- Utilities panel broadens study of regional calling system costs - Jn 14 88 18C
- Utilities plan no new power plants to meet climbing electricity needs - Jn 16 88 16C
- Thornburg asks panel to limit CP&L rate hike - Jy 14 88 2C
- CP&L trims rate hike request; opponents seek bigger cut - Jy 15 88 20C
- Commission blocks Duke's power line in Panthertown Valley - Jy 23 88 13A
- Panel mum on rate hike for CP&L - Jy 23 88 1C
- Ruling issued on uncertified phone services - Jy 23 88 12A
- Analysts predicting cut in CP&L's rate request - Jy 28 88 1C
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!