N&O Index Card
Subject/Name: Wake County Board of Commissioners
Article(s) Referenced In:
- Panel to study plan for tobacco allotment tax - Ja 7 91 5B
- Board stands by rezonings at Six Forks and Strickland - Ja 8 91 1B
- Wake Med construction gets board's support - Ja 11 91 2B
- More state money sought for day care aid - Ja 23 91 2B
- Wake commissioners frown on tax hike - Ja 24 91 1B
- Board urges look at new voting machines - Ja 25 91 2B
- Debate urged on banning some weapons (Wake County) - Ja 29 91 1B
- Commissioners to monitor day care funding - Fe 20 91 2B
- County employees on active duty get a break - Fe 20 91 2B
- Wake panel suggests anti-smoking policy; Proposal would affect county buildings, cars - Fe 26 91 1
- City, county debate how to spend room-tax revenue - Mr 2 91 1B
- Gun control supported at hearing; Hunters, public appear to build consensus - Mr 5 91 1B
- Wake rejects low-level N-waste disposal plan - Mr 5 91 5B
- Wake votes for office smoking ban; Policy angers county tobacco growers - Mr 5 91 1
- Editorial: Gun controls are jammed - Mr 7 91 16A
- County, towns wage turf war over planning - Mr 11 91 1B
- Political favors start early; Campaign promise finding fulfillment - Mr 18 91 1B
- New tax proposals unveiled; Wake board mulls a menu of levies - Mr 21 91 1B
- Wake commissioners unveil tax proposals - Mr 26 91 1B
- Wake urges hunting law changes; Plan would restrict high-powered rifles - Mr 26 91 1
- Editorial: Frozen on high-powered rifles - Mr 27 91 14A
- Wake parents may get time off for school - Mr 30 91 3B
- Wake endorses sports authority to build Bulls facility in Raleigh - Ap 2 91 4B
- Commissioners drop support for income tax - Ap 16 91 1B
- Wake says school budget would mean tax increase - Ap 18 91 5B
- Role of waste site group gains support - Ap 19 91 2B
- State cut leaves Wake with $850,000 revenue loss - My 21 91 1B
- Board seeks a time-out in bout between Wake sheriff, manager - Jn 13 91 1
- Wake joins waste suit; Board will fight site with Chatham - Au 2 91 1
- Wake commissioners limit U.S. 64 growth - Au 27 91 1
- Water rules plan attacked; State proposal would hurt Garner, panel told - Oc 1 91 1B
- Wake backs tougher watershed standards - Oc 22 91 1
- Wake asserts control over watershed land; County to determine future of 2,000 acres - De 3 91 1B
See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.
Places you might find this article:
Search For This Topic
Help us correct this text for future researchers.
Type your transcription below – don't worry about formatting. Please include the line number you are correcting.
Thank you!