N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Wake County Planning Board

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Only written road plans can block proposed subdivisions, attorney says - Mr 8 90 6B
2. Subdivisions OK'd in path of bypass - Mr 22 90 2B
3. Two (Maynard; McMullen) nominated to planning board - Mr 29 90 2B
4. Commissioners disagree on way to choose (Planning) board - Ap 3 90 2B
5. Wake report sets up challenge to municipalities' jurisdictions - Ap 5 90 5B
6. Planning board appointments made (McMullen; Maynard) - Ap 17 90 2B
7. Developer asked to make room for Outer Loop - Ap 19 90 5B
8. Wake planners approve 2 subdivisions - Ap 19 90 2B
9. Planning board discusses use of study (acres controlled by municipalities) - Ap 24 90 2B
10. Outer Loop development list grows - My 5 90 2B
11. Planning Board approves 2 projects (Little River Run & Bishopsgate subdivisions) - My 22 90 2B
12. Missing lot a puzzle to board (Map) - Jn 21 90 5B
13. Planning board approves subdivisions - Jn 22 90 2B
14. Planners oppose (denser) development request - Jn 28 90 2B
15. Town (Apex), county agree on land-use plan - Au 7 90 2B
16. Wake planners endorse Strickland Road rezoning - Oc 4 90 1B
17. Six Forks rezoning discouraged; Developer targets Strickland Road area - Oc 18 90 5B

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.