N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Watersheds

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Falls Lake panel finishes plan to curb residential, commercial development - Ja 3 85 1C
2. Landowners await development plan for Falls Lake basin - Ja 7 85 1C
3. Planning panel backs Durant Road as Falls Lake development boundary - Ja 8 85 1C
4. Editorial: - Lake proposal too risky - Ja 9 85 4A
5. Commission wants review of progress by Chatham in developing Jordan plan - Ja 11 85 8B
6. Wake official to ask commissioners to scrap law on stormwater runoff - Ja 18 85 1D
7. Some commissioners want to scrap ordinance on development runoff - Ja 19 85 1C
8. Editorial: - Burden rests on Heater - Ja 26 85 4A
9. Falls basin rules, subdivision OK'd - Mr 6 85 1C
10. Board delays action on request for stricter Swift Creek zoning - Mr 7 85 21A
11. Board OKs Jordan Lake restrictions - Mr 19 85 5C
12. Watershed zoning request denied (Falls Lake Watershed) - Mr 19 85 1
13. Council urged to expand jurisdiction to protect Swift Creek - Ap 3 85 4C
14. Raleigh asked to consider Wake's Swift Creek plan - Ap 14 85 39A
15. Board to restrict growth in Swift Creek basin area - Ap 16 85 12A
16. Watershed group (Falls and Jordan Lakes), Rhodes meet - My 2 85 17A
17. 500 acres in Swift Creek watershed given environmental safeguards - My 21 85 1C
18. Outer Loop could force trade-off in watershed rules - Se 9 85 1
19. Higher density plan offered for (Falls Lake) watershed - Oc 16 85 4C
20. Planning board votes against proposal to allow higher density in watershed - Oc 17 85 4C
21. Regional standards urged for Falls Lake protection - No 7 85 3C
22. Rezoning near watershed opposed - No 7 85 1C
23. Commissioners vote against rezoning for offices near Falls Lake watershed - No 19 85 1
24. Editorial: - Watershed fate on line - No 21 85 16A
25. City Council OKs density trade-off, excludes parts of Falls Lake watershed - No 22 85 1
26. Regulation of development uneven in Falls Lake basin - No 24 85 29A
27. Editorial: - Right way on watershed - No 25 85 12A
28. Plan would allow state to protect watersheds - No 27 85 1C
29. Board votes to deny watershed rezoning - De 5 85 2C
30. Part of site for mall drains into watershed - De 14 85 1C
31. Commissioner says Cary should adopt watershed rules - De 17 85 2C
32. Plan to protect watersheds endorsed by commissioners - De 17 85 1C
33. Panel endorses plan to protect watersheds - De 19 85 30A

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.