N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Watersheds

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Residents fear effect of roads on watershed (Map) - Ja 11 90 1F
2. Triangle watersheds (Map) - Ja 16 90 7A
3. Meeting urged on Falls watershed - Ja 19 90 2B
4. Conflicts muddy watershed issue - Ja 25 90 1F
5. Triangle watersheds (Map) - Ja 25 90 8F
6. Rural residents assail Orange watershed plan - Ja 31 90 2B
7. Cary joining Wake, 3 towns in backing Swift Creek plan - Fe 7 90 7B
8. Editorial: Runoff-pond logjam broken - Fe 9 90 14A
9. New study of Falls Lake watershed sought - Fe 22 90 6B
10. Builders seek water controls for all - Fe 23 90 3B
11. Accords sought on development in Swift Creek basin (Map) - Mr 19 90 4B
12. Wake OKs Swift Creek watershed plan - Ap 3 90 1B
13. Wake, Raleigh officials discuss watershed - Ap 17 90 5B
14. Panel backs stricter rules to protect drinking water - My 1 90 4B
15. Editorial: - No dilution of water rules - My 4 90 20A
16. Editorial: Watershed study needed now - Jn 25 90 8A
17. Manager seeks watershed report; Durham official asks planners to describe role in developing 1985 rules - Au 18 90 2B
18. Editorial: Keeping it safe to drink - Au 21 90 10A
19. Durham maps wrong; Finding could affect Treyburn, landfill - Se 7 90 1
20. Work on Falls Lake ordinance defended - Se 11 90 2B
21. Revised map puts N. Raleigh site on road to growth - Se 17 90 1B
22. Treyburn attorney (Spaulding) enters water debate - Se 23 90 2C
23. Durham residents debate issue of redrawing map of Falls Lake - Se 25 90 6B
24. Bulldozers may alter watershed; Landowner proposes changing lay of land - Se 26 90 1B
25. City, county plan watershed study - Oc 3 90 2B
26. Durham leaders disagree on Falls Lake rules - Oc 3 90 1B
27. Officials spar over Falls Lake protection - Oc 10 90 1B
28. 2-state authority proposed for (Catawba) river - Oc 13 90 4B
29. Officials urge watershed pollution study - Oc 16 90 2B
30. Watershed site denied for school - Oc 16 90 1B
31. Durham County board's leadership, Falls Lake stand at stake in election - Oc 30 90 1B
32. Board reverses stance on watershed limits - No 6 90 1B
33. School site in watershed reconsidered - No 20 90 1B
34. School decision involves more than education - No 22 90 1B
35. Panel OKs watershed building; Board approves school construction and rezoning; critics assail moves - No 27 90 1B
36. Durham to check Falls Lake maps - De 12 90 2B
37. Phosphorus levels declining in Triangle watersheds (Chart) - De 20 90 11A
38. Joint study of watershed wins OK; City and county hope for policy concensus - De 27 90 2F

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.