N&O Index Card

Subject/Name: Zoning - Raleigh

Article(s) Referenced In:

1. Brookhaven residents oppose new hotel near neighborhood - Ja 19 90 5B
2. Rezoning for proposed shopping center (at Poole and Sunnybrook roads) - Ja 25 90 1B
3. Editorial: Code not cast in concrete - Fe 17 90 14A
4. Planners approve Marriott rezoning - Mr 1 90 2B
5. Action held on rezoning of land near Umstead - Mr 10 90 7B
6. City OKs rezoning of Umstead buffer (Map) - Mr 16 90 1
7. Rezoning sought for 25 acres in southwest Raleigh - Mr 21 90 2B
8. Rezoning sought for woodland; Shopping center gets limited support - Mr 30 90 5B
9. Shopping center rezoning backed (Map) - Ap 18 90 1B
10. Residents oppose rezoning request (Creedmoor & West Millbrook roads) - My 16 90 2B
11. Raleigh City Council hears 4 rezoning requests - My 18 90 5B
12. Neighbors object to bid to rezone apartment area (Palms Apts.) - My 25 90 1B
13. Residents object to zoning bid; Millbrook Road traffic flow cited - My 26 90 2B
14. Architect seeks zoning change; Raleigh council asked to allow more growth in Falls Lake watershed - Jn 16 90 2B
15. Commission objects to buffer rezoning - Jn 28 90 2B
16. Panel denies Creedmoor Road rezoning request - Jy 11 90 2B
17. Creedmoor rezoning called a city test case - Jy 13 90 5B
18. Denser housing debated; Planners tout proposed new zoning district - Jy 16 90 1B
19. Editorial: Hold the line on Creedmoor - Jy 17 90 10A
20. Council to hold hearing on Creedmoor plan - Jy 18 90 7B
21. Mordecai residents debate rezoning plan - Jy 18 90 7B
22. Raleigh board called out-of-bounds on zoning - Jy 21 90 1B
23. Neighbors to battle Creedmoor Road plan - Au 1 90 3B
24. Developer wants Six Forks rezoning - Au 16 90 2B
25. Panel backs rezoning land in Mordecai - Au 16 90 2B
26. Creedmoor Road proposal rejected - Se 5 90 2B
27. Board backs office zone on 10.9 acres (Neuse & Strickland roads) - Se 12 90 2B
28. Raleigh homeowners decry rezoning proposal (to R-10) - Se 19 90 5B
29. Density rules are opposed; Man protests law on what a family is - Se 20 90 1F
30. Six Forks rezoning requests hits delay - Se 20 90 2B
31. Editorial: Strickland Road is far enough - Se 21 90 16A
32. Editorial: 2 + 1 = naughty, naughty? - Se 22 90 12A
33. Planners back retail, office uses for tract (Falls of the Neuse & Spring Forest Rds.) - Oc 3 90 5B
34. Wake planners endorse Strickland Road rezoning - Oc 4 90 1B
35. Six Forks rezoning discouraged; Developer targets Strickland Road area - Oc 18 90 5B
36. Request to rezone (Ingleside) horse farm hits impediment - No 1 90 2B
37. Planners advise against horse-farm rezoning - No 15 90 2B
38. Man (Byrne) seeks to rezone land for industry use - No 17 90 3B
39. Residents oppose office zoning for Creedmoor - No 23 90 2B
40. New vote on disputed Six Forks zoning sought - No 29 90 1B
41. Board told Six Forks rezoning decision is final - De 4 90 2B
42. Council favors rezoning for shopping center - De 12 90 2B

See a typo in our data? Let us know and we'll fix it.