N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-7 of 7 results.
Ashland Chemical Company
- Allegation that toxic chemical was spilled, not stolen, probed - Oc 31 85 1
- Despite missing toxic chemicals, Ashland passed state inspection - No 1 85 17A
- Test results from alleged chemical spill (Ashland Chemical) not likely until next week, official says - No 1 85 1
- Gathering of samples under way at plant - No 2 85 1C
- State declines to release results of Ashland tests - No 5 85 1C
- Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
- Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
- Editorial: Keep Ashland records open - No 7 85 14A
- State cites police request in withholding (soil - and - water) test results - No 7 85 1C
- Officials discuss investigation of possible spill - No 8 85 12C
- Ashland facility was fined in 1980 for spill violations - No 9 85 5A
- Chemical traces found in samples at plant site - No 9 85 1
- Grand jury wants criminal probe of Ashland - No 13 85 1
- DHR considering options in case of Ashland Chemical - No 14 85 1C
- Editorial: Ashland facts still hidden - No 14 85 14A
- Federal grand jury asked to probe possible violations by Ashland - No 15 85 1C
- State fines Ashland, orders full cleanup of South Raleigh site - No 16 85 1
- State found 8 chemicals at Ashland site - No 17 85 44A
- Ashland case may change agency rules - No 19 85 1
- Ashland undecided on challenging order for cleanup, fines, official says - No 19 85 7A
- Editorial: Cure for 'chemophobia' - No 20 85 12A
- State agencies expect to further penalize Ashland - No 26 85 2C
- Ashland to remove storage tank after tests fail to rule out leak - No 28 85 16B
- Ashland probe may enter '86, Currin says - De 5 85 24A
- State, Ashland working on plan to stay compliance order, fine - De 7 85 12A
- State agency, Ashland agree to order correcting hazardous waste violations - De 11 85 1C
Ashland Chemical Company
- Allegation that toxic chemical was spilled, not stolen, probed - Oc 31 85 1
- Despite missing toxic chemicals, Ashland passed state inspection - No 1 85 17A
- Test results from alleged chemical spill (Ashland Chemical) not likely until next week, official says - No 1 85 1
- Gathering of samples under way at plant - No 2 85 1C
- State declines to release results of Ashland tests - No 5 85 1C
- Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
- Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
- Editorial: Keep Ashland records open - No 7 85 14A
- State cites police request in withholding (soil - and - water) test results - No 7 85 1C
- Officials discuss investigation of possible spill - No 8 85 12C
- Ashland facility was fined in 1980 for spill violations - No 9 85 5A
- Chemical traces found in samples at plant site - No 9 85 1
- Grand jury wants criminal probe of Ashland - No 13 85 1
- DHR considering options in case of Ashland Chemical - No 14 85 1C
- Editorial: Ashland facts still hidden - No 14 85 14A
- 22
Ashland Chemical Company
- Federal grand jury asked to probe possible violations by Ashland - No 15 85 1C
- State fines Ashland, orders full cleanup of South Raleigh site - No 16 85 1
- State found 8 chemicals at Ashland site - No 17 85 44A
- Ashland case may change agency rules - No 19 85 1
- Ashland undecided on challenging order for cleanup, fines, official says - No 19 85 7A
- Editorial: Cure for 'chemophobia' - No 20 85 12A
- State agencies expect to further penalize Ashland - No 26 85 2C
- Ashland to remove storage tank after tests fail to rule out leak - No 28 85 16B
- Ashland probe may enter '86, Currin says - De 5 85 24A
- State, Ashland working on plan to stay compliance order, fine - De 7 85 12A
- State agency, Ashland agree to order correcting hazardous waste violations - De 11 85 1C
Ashland Chemical Company
- Group urges city involvement in Ashland case - Mr 4 86 16C
- State fines Ashland Chemical $250,000, orders cleanup at site of chemical spill - Ap 8 86 1
- Chemicals found during Ashland tests linked to cancer in animals, humans - Ap 9 86 6A
- State fines Ashland $353,253 for spill - Ap 9 86 1
- South Raleigh residents worry about chemicals in water (near Ashland Chemical) - Ap 10 86 2C
- Editorial: Pollution merits crackdown - Ap 12 86 18A
- Ashland asks for hearing on cleanup - My 8 86 1C
- Developer buys polluted land, wasn't told of contamination - Jy 4 86 1D
Ashland Chemical Company
- Probe of chemical runoff (Ashland Chemical) in S. Raleigh might be sent to Justice Department - Ja 15 87 2C
- Chemical spill case (Ashland Chemical) - shows need for coordination, critics say - Fe 15 87 33A
- Company (Ashland) seeks permits to clean up chemical spill - Ap 17 87 4D
- Chemical spill's source still a mystery - My 13 87 1C
- Hearing begins on Ashland's appeal of fines - Se 23 87 1C
- Cleanup under way at Ashland Chemical - No 11 87 3C
Ashland Chemical Company
- High Point residents protest chemical plant - Mr 22 89 2C
- Environmental panel hears Ashland dispute - Ap 13 89 16C
- Panel sets fine of $68,181 for Raleigh chemical leak - Jn 9 89 1C
- Planned chemical plant near High Point stalled - Jn 27 89 2C
- Chemical plant plans rejected - Oc 25 89 18C
- Chemical spill called no threat to water (Greensboro) - De 19 89 4B