N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-7 of 7 results.
Ashland Chemical Company
  • Allegation that toxic chemical was spilled, not stolen, probed - Oc 31 85 1
  • Despite missing toxic chemicals, Ashland passed state inspection - No 1 85 17A
  • Test results from alleged chemical spill (Ashland Chemical) not likely until next week, official says - No 1 85 1
  • Gathering of samples under way at plant - No 2 85 1C
  • State declines to release results of Ashland tests - No 5 85 1C
  • Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
  • Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
  • Editorial: Keep Ashland records open - No 7 85 14A
  • State cites police request in withholding (soil - and - water) test results - No 7 85 1C
  • Officials discuss investigation of possible spill - No 8 85 12C
  • Ashland facility was fined in 1980 for spill violations - No 9 85 5A
  • Chemical traces found in samples at plant site - No 9 85 1
  • Grand jury wants criminal probe of Ashland - No 13 85 1
  • DHR considering options in case of Ashland Chemical - No 14 85 1C
  • Editorial: Ashland facts still hidden - No 14 85 14A
  • Federal grand jury asked to probe possible violations by Ashland - No 15 85 1C
  • State fines Ashland, orders full cleanup of South Raleigh site - No 16 85 1
  • State found 8 chemicals at Ashland site - No 17 85 44A
  • Ashland case may change agency rules - No 19 85 1
  • Ashland undecided on challenging order for cleanup, fines, official says - No 19 85 7A
  • Editorial: Cure for 'chemophobia' - No 20 85 12A
  • State agencies expect to further penalize Ashland - No 26 85 2C
  • Ashland to remove storage tank after tests fail to rule out leak - No 28 85 16B
  • Ashland probe may enter '86, Currin says - De 5 85 24A
  • State, Ashland working on plan to stay compliance order, fine - De 7 85 12A
  • State agency, Ashland agree to order correcting hazardous waste violations - De 11 85 1C
Ashland Chemical Company
  • Allegation that toxic chemical was spilled, not stolen, probed - Oc 31 85 1
  • Despite missing toxic chemicals, Ashland passed state inspection - No 1 85 17A
  • Test results from alleged chemical spill (Ashland Chemical) not likely until next week, official says - No 1 85 1
  • Gathering of samples under way at plant - No 2 85 1C
  • State declines to release results of Ashland tests - No 5 85 1C
  • Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
  • Kirk willing to release raw analyses on Ashland - No 6 85 1C
  • Editorial: Keep Ashland records open - No 7 85 14A
  • State cites police request in withholding (soil - and - water) test results - No 7 85 1C
  • Officials discuss investigation of possible spill - No 8 85 12C
  • Ashland facility was fined in 1980 for spill violations - No 9 85 5A
  • Chemical traces found in samples at plant site - No 9 85 1
  • Grand jury wants criminal probe of Ashland - No 13 85 1
  • DHR considering options in case of Ashland Chemical - No 14 85 1C
  • Editorial: Ashland facts still hidden - No 14 85 14A
  • 22
Ashland Chemical Company
  • Federal grand jury asked to probe possible violations by Ashland - No 15 85 1C
  • State fines Ashland, orders full cleanup of South Raleigh site - No 16 85 1
  • State found 8 chemicals at Ashland site - No 17 85 44A
  • Ashland case may change agency rules - No 19 85 1
  • Ashland undecided on challenging order for cleanup, fines, official says - No 19 85 7A
  • Editorial: Cure for 'chemophobia' - No 20 85 12A
  • State agencies expect to further penalize Ashland - No 26 85 2C
  • Ashland to remove storage tank after tests fail to rule out leak - No 28 85 16B
  • Ashland probe may enter '86, Currin says - De 5 85 24A
  • State, Ashland working on plan to stay compliance order, fine - De 7 85 12A
  • State agency, Ashland agree to order correcting hazardous waste violations - De 11 85 1C
Ashland Chemical Company
  • Group urges city involvement in Ashland case - Mr 4 86 16C
  • State fines Ashland Chemical $250,000, orders cleanup at site of chemical spill - Ap 8 86 1
  • Chemicals found during Ashland tests linked to cancer in animals, humans - Ap 9 86 6A
  • State fines Ashland $353,253 for spill - Ap 9 86 1
  • South Raleigh residents worry about chemicals in water (near Ashland Chemical) - Ap 10 86 2C
  • Editorial: Pollution merits crackdown - Ap 12 86 18A
  • Ashland asks for hearing on cleanup - My 8 86 1C
  • Developer buys polluted land, wasn't told of contamination - Jy 4 86 1D
Ashland Chemical Company
  • Probe of chemical runoff (Ashland Chemical) in S. Raleigh might be sent to Justice Department - Ja 15 87 2C
  • Chemical spill case (Ashland Chemical) - shows need for coordination, critics say - Fe 15 87 33A
  • Company (Ashland) seeks permits to clean up chemical spill - Ap 17 87 4D
  • Chemical spill's source still a mystery - My 13 87 1C
  • Hearing begins on Ashland's appeal of fines - Se 23 87 1C
  • Cleanup under way at Ashland Chemical - No 11 87 3C
Ashland Chemical Company
  • High Point residents protest chemical plant - Mr 22 89 2C
  • Environmental panel hears Ashland dispute - Ap 13 89 16C
  • Panel sets fine of $68,181 for Raleigh chemical leak - Jn 9 89 1C
  • Planned chemical plant near High Point stalled - Jn 27 89 2C
  • Chemical plant plans rejected - Oc 25 89 18C
  • Chemical spill called no threat to water (Greensboro) - De 19 89 4B
Ashland Chemical Company
  • Ashland settles claim, agrees to pay state $50,000 - Au 3 90 1B