N&O Index Card Listings
Displaying 1-10 of 12 results.
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- Ex-dean at Laurinburg says players failed to do school work - Mr 6 85 1C
- Poulton says athletes' lower standards, freshman eligibility must end at NCSU - Mr 6 85 1
- Officials favor tougher enforcement - Ap 18 85 1B
- Laurinburg athletes' credentials satisfactory, college officials say - Mr 7 85 23A
- Committee is formed to review athletic policies at UNC campuses - Mr 9 85 1C
- Survey on athletics OK'd by UNC panel - Mr 16 85 4C
- Athletes' grade problems disputed - Mr 25 85 16C
- UNC professor says academics need to be stressed to athletes - My 17 85 4D
- UNC chancellors pledge to support new athletic rules - My 30 85 5C
- Editorial: UNC bloc for NCAA - My 31 85 16A
- Sports scandals reflect wider problem - Jn 2 85 38A
- State university officials ready to make athletics rules stricter - Jn 15 85 1C
- Friday expects endorsement of proposals - Jn 18 85 1B
- Area coaches favor tougher stand - Jn 19 85 4B
- Debate continues about rules for freshman athletic eligibility - Jy 25 85 5C
- ACC schools won't impose Proposition 48, Casey says - Jy 26 85 9A
- Friday says standards must be upheld - Au 2 85 1C
- UNC governors oppose weakening Proposition 48 - Se 14 85 1
- NCSU trustees OK resolution by students on Proposition 48 - Se 15 85 33A
- Schools in UNC system must abide by Prop 48 - Se 19 85 1B
- Editorial: NCAA: Hold that line - Se 21 85 24A
- Exceptions to admissions policies - (Chart) - Oc 11 85 6A
- Low scores, graduation rates found in UNC System athletics - Oc 11 85 1
- Report cites statistics on athletes' graduation rates - Oc 11 85 14A
- Measures in place at UNC-CH, ECU - Oc 12 85 1B
- UNC governors approve athletics-academics report - Oc 12 85 1C
- UNC laterals a hot potato to its chancellors - Oc 13 85 16A
- Smith, Crum think report unfair to UNC - Oc 16 85 1B
- Athlete with SATs under 500 admitted, UNC report says - Oc 18 85 1D
- UNC followed admissions policy in athlete's case, Fordham says - Oc 19 85 1C
- Poulton criticizes coach Reed for not supporting Proposition 48 - Oc 26 85 1
- Rules for athletic admissions not uniform - Oc 26 85 1
- Poulton angered by his role in controversy - Oc 31 85 1B
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- High school athletes' class requirement up - Fe 7 85 1
- Washburn case to raise issue of athletic low scorers in class - Fe 8 85 1
- Editorial: Sports out of bounds - Fe 10 85 4D
- Faculty members concerned that colleges baby-sitting athletes - Fe 10 85 23A
- Graduating in 4 years is tough, NCSU ex-players say - Fe 12 85 1
- Editorial: the value of naming names - Fe 13 85 4A
- Friday queried on standards for athletes - Fe 20 85 14C
- Officials call for review of athletics policies - Fe 21 85 1
- Editorial: Putting sports in focus - Fe 22 85 4A
- New entrance policy for athletes had been set in '84, letter shows - Fe 22 85 15A
- SAT-minimum bills alarm universities - Fe 22 85 1
- Basketball just a path to a goal at (Laurinburg) institute - Fe 25 85 1
- (NCSU) Faculty group set to consider athletic reform - Fe 26 85 1C
- (NCSU) Faculty Senate wants freshmen out of top sports - Fe 27 85 1
- (NCSU) Athletic-admission proposal will get unhurried study - Fe 28 85 16C
- Editorial: Good for academicians - Fe 28 85 4A
- Riley wants records on academics kept private - Mr 2 85 1C
- Friday seeks support on frosh rule - Mr 5 85 1B
- Ex-dean at Laurinburg says players failed to do school work - Mr 6 85 1C
- Poulton says athletes' lower standards, freshman eligibility must end at NCSU - Mr 6 85 1
- Officials favor tougher enforcement - Ap 18 85 1B
- Laurinburg athletes' credentials satisfactory, college officials say - Mr 7 85 23A
- Committee is formed to review athletic policies at UNC campuses - Mr 9 85 1C
- Survey on athletics OK'd by UNC panel - Mr 16 85 4C
- Athletes' grade problems disputed - Mr 25 85 16C
- UNC professor says academics need to be stressed to athletes - My 17 85 4D
- UNC chancellors pledge to support new athletic rules - My 30 85 5C
- Editorial: UNC bloc for NCAA - My 31 85 16A
- Sports scandals reflect wider problem - Jn 2 85 38A
- State university officials ready to make athletics rules stricter - Jn 15 85 1C
- Friday expects endorsement of proposals - Jn 18 85 1B
- Area coaches favor tougher stand - Jn 19 85 4B
- Debate continues about rules for freshman athletic eligibility - Jy 25 85 5C
- ACC schools won't impose Proposition 48, Casey says - Jy 26 85 9A
- Friday says standards must be upheld - Au 2 85 1C
- UNC governors oppose weakening Proposition 48 - Se 14 85 1
- NCSU trustees OK resolution by students on Proposition 48 - Se 15 85 33A
- Schools in UNC system must abide by Prop 48 - Se 19 85 1B
- Editorial: NCAA: Hold that line - Se 21 85 24A
- Exceptions to admissions policies - (Chart) - Oc 11 85 6A
- Low scores, graduation rates found in UNC System athletics - Oc 11 85 1
- Report cites statistics on athletes' graduation rates - Oc 11 85 14A
- Measures in place at UNC-CH, ECU - Oc 12 85 1B
- UNC governors approve athletics-academics report - Oc 12 85 1C
- UNC laterals a hot potato to its chancellors - Oc 13 85 16A
- Smith, Crum think report unfair to UNC - Oc 16 85 1B
- Athlete with SATs under 500 admitted, UNC report says - Oc 18 85 1D
- UNC followed admissions policy in athlete's case, Fordham says - Oc 19 85 1C
- Poulton criticizes coach Reed for not supporting Proposition 48 - Oc 26 85 1
- Rules for athletic admissions not uniform - Oc 26 85 1
- Poulton angered by his role in controversy - Oc 31 85 1B
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- Friday wants UNC academic standards higher than new NCAA rule requires - Ja 18 86 1
- Editorial: UNC, ACC need to hold line - Ja 23 86 22A
- NCSU urged to tighten athletic eligibility - Ja 29 86 16C
- UNC panel recommends 2.0 minimum - Fe 1 86 1B
- Duke, NCSU, UNC to use Proposition 48 standards - Fe 8 86 1
- NCSU trustees endorse use of stricter Proposition 48 standards - Fe 9 86 38A
- Editorial: ACC can show the way - Fe 12 86 12A
- UNC's Div. I schools to abide by 'C' rule - Fe 15 86 1B
- Editorial: A lesson from Georgia - Ap 7 86 14A
- NCHSAA gains added eligibility responsibility - My 8 86 5B
- Ex-coach (MYRICK) accused of grade-tampering at Fuquay-Varina - Au 6 86 1
- Wake standards exceed state's - Au 10 86 1B
- Fordham won't release report on athletes - Oc 18 86 5C
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- High school athletes' class requirement up - Fe 7 85 1
- Washburn case to raise issue of athletic low scorers in class - Fe 8 85 1
- Editorial: Sports out of bounds - Fe 10 85 4D
- Faculty members concerned that colleges baby-sitting athletes - Fe 10 85 23A
- Graduating in 4 years is tough, NCSU ex-players say - Fe 12 85 1
- Editorial: the value of naming names - Fe 13 85 4A
- Friday queried on standards for athletes - Fe 20 85 14C
- Officials call for review of athletics policies - Fe 21 85 1
- Editorial: Putting sports in focus - Fe 22 85 4A
- New entrance policy for athletes had been set in '84, letter shows - Fe 22 85 15A
- SAT-minimum bills alarm universities - Fe 22 85 1
- Basketball just a path to a goal at (Laurinburg) institute - Fe 25 85 1
- (NCSU) Faculty group set to consider athletic reform - Fe 26 85 1C
- (NCSU) Faculty Senate wants freshmen out of top sports - Fe 27 85 1
- (NCSU) Athletic-admission proposal will get unhurried study - Fe 28 85 16C
- Editorial: Good for academicians - Fe 28 85 4A
- Riley wants records on academics kept private - Mr 2 85 1C
- Friday seeks support on frosh rule - Mr 5 85 1B
- 23
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- NCSU student panel proposes 'no C, no play' - Mr 12 87 5C
- UNC system athletes still lag in graduating - Oc 9 87 1
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- Schools drop standards for student athletes - Se 12 82 16A
- ACC's top student athletes get assist on academic turf - Se 14 82 1
- Athletes have lower grades, higher graduation rates - Se 14 82 8A
- High standards don't mean losing teams - Se 14 82 8A
- Schools accept players who don't meet standards - Se 14 82 8A
- Officials want to raise NCAA academic standards - Se 15 82 12A
- NCAA convention to tackle issue of athletic eligibility requirements - De 19 82 49A
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- Tougher grade standards for (high school) athletes studied - My 15 84 10A
- Prep group proposes tougher academics - De 6 84 5B
Athletes - Academic Requirements
- UNC panel backs new standards for athletes - Ja 22 83 1C
- Academic standards - Fe 9 83 3C
- Few athletes finish (college) in 4, survey says - My 19 83 1B
