N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-8 of 8 results.
Billboards
  • Cities seek to whittle roadside billboards - Ja 12 87 16C
  • Advertising company (Naegele) loses bid to beat limits on billboard size - Fe 24 87 1C
  • Municipalities praise ruling on billboards - Fe 25 87 18C
  • City Council to study ban on all billboards - My 6 87 3C
  • Bill to weaken sign restrictions zooms through House committee - My 8 87 1
  • Editorial: Backward on billboards - My 8 87 18A
  • Billboard proposal's foes win delay - My 9 87 10A
  • Billboard bill delayed - My 10 87 38A
  • Counties' bids to control billboards may be thwarted by the legislature - My 12 87 1C
  • Sign bill gets tentative OK from House - My 13 87 1
  • Editorial: Sign for the Senate: Stop - My 14 87 18A
  • House passes sign bill after exempting Raleigh - My 14 87 1
  • Billboard bill changed - My 17 87 30A
  • Senate OKs payment for removed billboards - My 22 87 17A
  • Senate is set to debate bill on billboards - My 25 87 1C
  • Dare County islet focus of debate on sign ordinance - Jn 1 87 1C
  • Editorial: Let the billboard bill die - Jn 1 87 12A
  • Billboard act hits yellow light in committee - Jy 8 87 2C
  • Editorial: Stop sign on billboards - Jy 11 87 16A
  • Billboard showdown expected; Senate panel has held measure since May 13 - Jy 23 87 25A
  • Senate panel apparently kills billboard reimbursement bill - Jy 24 87 1
  • Billboard ordinances post victory in Senate - Jy 26 87 29A
Billboards
  • Editorial: City of oaks, or billboards? - Ap 23 83 4A
  • Panel backs new thoroughfare zoning with setbacks, spacing for billboards - Jn 28 83 1C
  • Hunt uncommitted on billboards, aide says - Au 20 83 2C
  • N. C. cities deal with sign problems - Au 29 83 6A
  • Raleigh joins cities across the nation in trend to ban or restrict billboards - Au 29 83 1
  • Panel urges billboard ban or tighter size restrictions (Raleigh) - Au 30 83 1
  • Durham developer says billboard ban would aid cities - Se 30 83 8B
  • Stiffer requirements for billboards would hurt Naegele, founder says - Oc 5 83 6A
  • New billboard rules viewed as toughest in state - Oc 19 83 2C
  • Wake imposes moratorium on billboards - No 8 83 1
  • Garner committee suggests stringent rules on billboards - No 26 83 2C
Billboards
  • N. C. groups' billboard urges voting act extension - Fe 18 82 19A
  • Billboards to remain on route to RDU - but with restrictions - Jn 22 82 2C
Billboards
  • Panel rejects bid to force cities to pay for billboards - Mr 12 92, 4B
  • Editorial: Clear-eyed billboard view - Mr 18 92, 10A
  • Owners ignore ruling, leave 111 billboards up - Ap 17 92, 5B
  • 3,100 billboards in state must go - or money will - My 2 92, 1
  • Removing billboard: 10 top counties - (Chart) - My 2 92, 5A
  • Editorial: Billboards' bottom line - My 9 92, 14A
  • Court upholds Raleigh billboard ordinance - My 19 92, 1B
  • Editorial: Court's roadside message - My 23 92, 12A
  • Pedro may fade with Burma Shave; Government says signs (for South of the Border) must go - Jn 1 92, 4B
Billboards
  • Reynolds probing billboard deals - Mr 6 84 2C
  • Board can't agree on billboard size limit - Mr 8 84 1C
  • Stricter height limit on billboards backed - Ap 19 84 4C
  • Billboard rivals do verbal battle over proposed sign regulations - My 8 84 1C
  • Billboards banned on Orange highways - Jn 6 84 2C
  • (Wake) County panel delays action on billboards - Jn 7 84 2C
  • Action delayed on billboard ordinance - Jy 3 84 2C
  • Lawsuit filed to fight billboard ruling - Jy 19 84 1C
  • Off-site billboards to 300 square feet OK'd by (Wake) commissioners in
  • split vote - Jy 31 84 1C
Billboards
  • Under the dome: Henderson County billboard ban put in bill - Jy 11 85 1
  • Editorial: Bad sign in the mountains (banned billboards) - Jy 13 85 16A
  • Judge dismisses Naegele lawsuit challenging billboard ordinance - Oc 18 85 1D
Billboards
  • Dare warned that billboard removal may threaten road funds - Ja 5 86 34A
  • Talking billboards make noise in Piedmont - Mr 2 86 35A
  • Residents, businessmen battle over billboards (Currituck Co.) - Jn 27 86 11B
  • Panel says highway billboards should be smaller, farther apart - No 14 86 8C
Billboards
  • Raleigh mall cancels billboard ads - Mr 9 91 10C
  • Billboard bout builds along I-40; 2 towns stir debate by allowing signs - Mr 12 91 1
  • Editorial: Bad signs along I-40 - Mr 13 91 10A
  • Legislator hopes to limit I-40 billboards - Ap 20 91 1B
  • Editorial: Caution: billboards ahead - My 2 91 16A
  • Billboard industry renews attack - My 6 91 1B
  • Billboard ordinances spur talk, no action - My 8 91 3B
  • Editorial: Bad pitch on billboards - My 10 91 16A
  • Billboard battle tops legislators' program - My 13 91 1B
  • Bill gutting local billboard laws clears House panel - My 15 91 2B
  • House defeats billboard ban on I-40 - My 15 91 3B
  • Summary of key legislative votes - My 16 91 3B
  • Effort to gut billboard laws stalls in House - My 17 91 3B
  • Bill to gut billboard laws sent back to committee - My 23 91 3B
  • Tar Heel editors speak: Standing up for billboards - Jn 30 91 7J
  • Raleigh anti-billboard ordinance upheld - Oc 29 91 2B
  • Wake to let signs stand - No 27 91 1B