N&O Index Card Listings

Displaying 1-4 of 4 results.
Coastal Resources Commission
  • Panel begins study of military projects - Ja 6 89 18C
  • Appointees get ethics warning; Panel (Coastal Resources Commission) foresees possible conflict
  • of interests - Ja 22 89 23A
  • N.C. coastal panel adopts conflict of interest rule - Ja 27 89 WA-1
  • Critic questions coastal panel guidelines - Ja 28 89 8B
  • Stronger ethics code urged for coastal panel - Mr 18 89 1C
  • Editorial: Tougher on coastal conflicts - Mr 23 89 12A
  • Environmentalists say coastal rules too lenient - Ap 1 89 1
  • Water protection rules proposed - Ap 13 89 3C
  • Coastal commission's structure debated - My 2 89 3C
  • Rules for coastal panel backed; Eight of 15 seats would be reserved for non-developers - My 4 89 30A
  • Editorial: Coastal 'balance' unnecessary - My 5 89 20A
  • House approves limit on coastal panel seats - My 10 89 1C
  • Wrightsville bulkhead built by EMC member (Turner) to stand - My 26 89 3C
  • Panel to allow project to protect Bonner bridge (Map) - My 27 89 1C
  • Panel denies plea for sandbag wall to protect N.C. 12 - Jy 28 89 22C
  • Military may get limits on coastal flights - Jy 29 89 3C
  • Under the Dome: Rules leave Martin seeking appointee (for Coastal Resources Commission) - Au 2 89 1
  • Panel won't hear attempt to block barrier for inlet - Au 10 89 14C
  • Development group's clout in coastal regulation fuels fears - Se 5 89 1
  • Wearing two hats (members of Economic Alliance of NC serving on EMC and CRC) - Se 5 89 6A
  • Coastal panel weakens forest protection drive - Se 30 89 1
  • Marina permit upheld despite protests (Map) - Oc 19 89 4C
  • Beach erosion controls gaining favor with CRC - De 2 89 4B
  • Panel votes to limit military air maneuvers - De 2 89 4B
  • Town continues erosion battle; Topsail Beach wants rule changed to allow groin on island - De 23 89 4B
Coastal Resources Commission
  • Panel firmly against beach jetties, walls - Ja 26 90 1B
  • Editorial: A jetty well jettisoned - Ja 27 90 12A
  • State panel reaffirms ban on coastal jetties - Ja 27 90 4B
  • Commission considers rental fees; Leasing public waters may fund special lands - Mr 30 90 4B
  • Water-quality panel discusses pollutants threatening coast - Mr 31 90 4B
  • Editorial: Cultivating clean water - Ap 12 90 20A
  • Harrington to get Coastal Resources post - Jn 30 90 1B
  • Coastal panel chief (Harrington) might have conflicts (consultant for Mobil Oil) - Jy 19 90 4B
  • Panel weighs protection for coastal forests - Jy 28 90 1B
  • Airspace regulation stirs dispute - Au 3 90 4B
  • Foes of Ocracoke pier seek to appeal permit - Se 21 90 4B
  • Forest rules rejected; CRC denies 3 areas extra protection (maritime forests) - Se 29 90 1B
  • Editorial: Forests in the balance - De 5 90 16A
  • Coastal nursery dredging ban pits builders, environmentalists - De 8 90 4B
  • Maritime forest controls rejected; State panel cites local efforts to protect areas from development - De 8 90 4B
Coastal Resources Commission
  • Panel's study calls for stricter wetland-protection measures - Fe 1 91 4B
  • Panel may rethink ban on beach-hardening structures - Fe 2 91 4B
  • CRC deadlock saps strength of coastal law - Fe 17 91 1C
  • Editorial: All 'interested' in the coast - Fe 25 91 8A
  • Scientists propose ranking state wetlands - Mr 21 91 2B
  • Coastal panel delays vote on easing structure rules (seawalls, etc.) - Mr 22 91 1B
  • State panel approves disputed marina in Oriental - Mr 23 91 1B
  • State panel bans dredging to protect fish nurseries - Mr 23 91 2B
  • Court faults state panel (Coastal Resources Commission) for OK of Bonner jetty - Ap 3 91 4B
  • Bill seeks to change coastal rules panel; Real estate interests would have less influence on
  • development - My 9 91 4B
  • CRC chief seeks to soften seawall ban - Jn 14 91 3B
  • Editorial: Hold fast on the coast - Jy 24 91 10A
  • Success of jetties unpredictable, scientists tell coastal commission - Jy 26 91 4B
  • Panel keeps seawall ban; Proposal to ease tough state regulation is dropped - Jy 27 91 1
  • Coastal policy commission split by appointments, report finds - Oc 3 91 4B
  • CRC denies variance for Davis; Oilman sought to protect Bald Head Island home with sandbags - De 14 91 2B
Coastal Resources Commission
  • State may yield control of Hatteras forest use - Mr 25 88 4C
  • Conflict-of-interest probe sought in Martin appointee's land dealings (Watson) - Jn 30 88 4C
  • Ethics board reproves coastal panel member (WATSON) - Jy 7 88 1
  • Editorial: Too careless for the coast - Jy 14 88 14A
  • Coastal panel lets OK of developments stand - Jy 30 88 2C
  • Policy group (Coastal Resources Commission) is getting 5 new faces - Au 21 88 31A
  • Martin accused of stacking coastal agency - Au 25 88 1C
  • Editorial: Martin tilts coastal agency - Au 29 88 6A
  • Commission asking Martin to petition to stop training center - Se 24 88 3C
  • Editorial: Developer warrants quick kick - No 1 88 14A
  • Coastal Resources Commission members No 3 88 WA-1
  • Editorial: Strange 'balance' on the coast (appointments to commissions) No 4 88 14A
  • Developer faces fine for clearing without permit (Buxton Woods) - De 3 88 4C
  • Protective legislation proposed; Coastal development, sewer lines considered - De 4 88 52A